Cited by 122Attachment and Relationship DynamicsFamily Dynamics and RelationshipsChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

The Salience of Adolescent Romantic Experiences for Romantic Relationship Qualities in Young Adulthood

Madsen, Stephanie D., Collins, W. Andrew·2011·Journal of Research on Adolescence

Abstract

Conceptual links between aspects of adolescents' dating experiences (i.e., involvement and quality; ages 15–17.5) and qualities of their romantic relationships in young adulthood (ages 20–21) were examined in a prospective longitudinal design. Even after accounting for earlier relationship experiences with parents and peers, aspects of adolescent dating experiences predicted romantic relationship qualities in young adulthood. Adolescents who dated fewer partners in mid‐adolescence and who experienced a better quality dating relationship at age 16 demonstrated romantic partner interactions characterized by smoother relationship process in young adulthood (e.g., negotiating conflict to mutual satisfaction, effective and timely caregiving/seeking); adolescents who dated more partners in mid‐adolescence displayed greater negative affect in romantic partner interactions in young adulthood.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1532-7795.2011.00737.x

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Psychosocial adjustment may be affected by factors related to romantic involvement such as relationship quality and sexual experiences, which were not included in the present study.

    “Finally, psychosocial adjustment may be affected by factors related to romantic involvement such as relationship quality (Madsen and Collins 2011) and sexual experiences (Williams et al. 2008), which were not included in the present study.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Madsen, S. D., & Collins, W. A.
Affiliations
  • McDaniel College (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
Madsen, Stephanie D.
Venue
Journal of Research on Adolescence
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-03-09
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
789-801
ISSN
  • 1050-8392 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7795
OpenAlex
W1498185651
Cited by
122
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
8.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Research on Adolescence (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
romantic relationships, early adulthood, relationship quality, partner interaction, conflict negotiation, caregiving, negative affect, parent-adolescent relationships, peer relationships

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review