The DOI matches its Crossref record.
HOW TO THINK ABOUT MENTAL QUALITIES
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
PRM's answer to the second question appeals to quality space theory, a view that claims that phenomenal qualities can be reduced to the discriminations they allow for the system.
“Its answer to this second question appeals to quality space theory, a view that claims that phenomenal qualities can be reduced to the discriminations they allow for the system (Clark 2000, Rosenthal 2010, Lau et al. 2022).”
From Consciousness in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Science of Consciousness (2023) · cites this paper as Rosenthal 2010
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Consciousness in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Science of Consciousness
Butlin, P., Long, R., Elmoznino, E., Bengio, Y., Birch, J., Constant, A., Deane, G., Fleming, S. M., Frith, C., Ji, X., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2308.08708 · Cited by 196
Unpacking the complexities of consciousness: Theories and reflections
Mudrik, L., Boly, M., Dehaene, S., Fleming, S. M., Lamme, V., Seth, A., & Melloni, L. (2025) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025.106053 · Cited by 81
Local neuronal relational structures underlying the contents of human conscious experience
Malach, R. (2021) · Neuroscience of Consciousness · doi:10.1093/nc/niab028 · Cited by 53
Lacalli, T. (2021) · Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsys.2021.697129 · Cited by 11
Neuroscience undermines the higher-order theorists' preferred solution to the targetless HOT problem
Kozuch, B. (2026) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2026.2629514
Metadata
- Authors
- Rosenthal, D.
- Affiliations
- City University of New York (US)
- Corresponding author
- Rosenthal, David
- ORCID
- Rosenthal, David
- Venue
- Philosophical Issues
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-10
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 368-393
- ISSN
- 1533-6077 (ISSN-L)
- 1758-2237
- OpenAlex
- W1532073305
- Cited by
- 209
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 25 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 3.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Philosophical Issues (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Keywords
- psychological quality, psychological characteristics, philosophy of mind, mental states, concept of mind
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
