The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Formal and Informal Social Controls of Employee Deviance
Abstract
Using the phenomenon of deviance by employees against the rules of the formal work organization as the behavior of interest, the differential saliences of both formal (i.e., management) and informal (i.e., co-worker) sanction severity are empirically compared. As hypothesized, the perceived threat of informal sanctions by one's fellow co-workers explains both property deviance and production deviance far better than the perceived severity of the more formal responses initiated by management. Further, if the two forms of social control are causally ordered, we find that management actions to constrain deviant employees do have an effect, albeit indirect, in that formal sanctions operate on deviance indirectly by shaping the informal sanctions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sanction, fear, and the maintenance of social order
Tittle, C. R. (1977) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2577457 · Cited by 161
Cited by
Kaptein, M. (2008) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.520 · Cited by 522
Aquino, K., & Bradfield, M. (2000) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.11.5.525.15205 · Cited by 275
Chernyak-Hai, L., & Tziner, A. (2014) · Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones · doi:10.5093/tr2014a1 · Cited by 129
Metadata
- Authors
- Hollinger, R. C., & Clark, J. P.
- Venue
- The Sociological Quarterly
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1982-06
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 333-343
- ISSN
- 0038-0253 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-8525
- OpenAlex
- W2162271946
- Cited by
- 379
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.