Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 452

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The independent association of massive blood loss with mortality in cardiac surgery

Karkouti, Keyvan, Wijeysundera, Duminda N., Yau, Terrence M., Beattie, W. Scott, Abdelnaem, Esamelden, McCluskey, Stuart A., Ghannam, Mohammed, Yeo, Eric, Djaiani, George, Karski, Jacek·2004·Transfusion

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although the association between massive perioperative blood loss (MBL) and adverse outcomes is well recognized, it is unclear whether MBL is an independent risk factor or, instead, simply a marker for other adverse events or severity of illness. The objective of this cohort study was to quantify the independent association of MBL in cardiac surgery with all‐cause in‐hospital mortality. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Data were prospectively collected on consecutive patients who underwent cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass at a quaternary‐care academic center from 1999 to 2003. The number of red blood cell (RBC) units transfused within 1 day of surgery was used as a surrogate measure of perioperative blood loss. Receiver‐operating characteristic curve analyses were employed to identify the most appropriate cutoff for defining MBL. The independent association of MBL with mortality was determined with multivariable logistic regression analyses. Bootstrapping and sensitivity analyses were used to confirm the validity of the results. RESULTS: MBL was defined as receiving at least 5 units of RBCs within 1 day of surgery. Of 9215 patients analyzed, 1.8 percent (n = 169) died and 9.7 percent (n = 890) had MBL. After adjusting for multiple potential confounders (including perioperative adverse events), MBL was associated with an 8.1‐fold (95% confidence interval, 3.9‐17.0) increase in the odds of death. This risk estimate was stable across different modeling conditions as well as in bootstrap sampling. CONCLUSION: MBL after cardiac surgery has a strong, independent association with in‐hospital mortality.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2004.04144.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 452

Metadata

Authors
Karkouti, K., Wijeysundera, D. N., Yau, T. M., Beattie, W. S., Abdelnaem, E., McCluskey, S. A., Ghannam, M., Yeo, E., Djaiani, G., & Karski, J.
Venue
Transfusion
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-09-22
Volume
44
Issue
10
Pages
1453-1462
ISSN
  • 0041-1132 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-2995
OpenAlex
W2080712219
Cited by
452
References
3
FWCI
9.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The independent association of massive blood loss with mortality in cardiac surgery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1537-2995.2004.04144.x
The paper
Karkouti, K., Wijeysundera, D. N., Yau, T. M., Beattie, W. S., Abdelnaem, E., McCluskey, S. A., Ghannam, M., Yeo, E., Djaiani, G., & Karski, J. (2004). The independent association of massive blood loss with mortality in cardiac surgery. Transfusion. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1537-2995.2004.04144.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.