Cited by 6Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality ControlBlood transfusion and managementBlood donation and transfusion practices

Reducing costs in flow-cytometric counting of residual white blood cells in blood products: utilization of a single-platform bead-free flow-rate calibration method

Fischer, Johannes C., Quenzel, Ernst M., Moog, Rainer, Wenzel, Folker, Riethmacher, Regina, Tutschek, Boris, Giers, Günther·2011·Transfusion

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Commercial flow-cytometric methods for counting residual white blood cells (rWBCs) in leukoreduced blood products use calibration beads for estimation of the measured sample volume. A bead-free flow-rate calibration method is developed and validated. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The analyzed volume was calculated by acquisition time (ACQ). Twenty-nine spiking series of red blood cell (RBC) or platelet (PLT) products were prepared containing levels ranging from 0.08 × 10(6) up to 2048 × 10(6) WBCs/L. Nearly WBC-free triple-leukofiltered RBCs or PLT concentrates (PCs) served as background. Propidium iodide (PI) was used to identify rWBCs. Five RBC series were compared against a commercially available kit (LeukoSure, Beckman Coulter). Routine capabilities were tested on 41 RBC and 92 PC samples of two independent transfusion services. RESULTS: The lower detection limit in RBC was 0.08 × 10(6) rWBCs/L for ACQ and 0.16 for LeukoSure. Criteria for linearity, accuracy, and precision were fulfilled within the range of 0.5 × 10(6) to 512 × 10(6) WBCs/L. For PCs, all these criteria were fulfilled between 0.5 × 10(6) and 32 × 10(6) rWBCs/L (lower detection limit of 0.25) for PI. ACQ and LeukoSure agreed sufficiently (81%) when tested on routine RBCs or PCs. CONCLUSION: A residual WBC count of fewer than 0.5 × 10(6) WBCs/L can be accurately counted using the ACQ approach at a total reagent cost of less than 0.5€ per sample.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.02998.x

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Differences in immune reactivity and susceptibility to infectious diseases between males and females are well described.

    “Differences in immune reactivity and susceptibility to infectious diseases between males and females is well described (reviewed in [40], [41], [46], [47], [48]).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fischer, J. C., Quenzel, E. M., Moog, R., Wenzel, F., Riethmacher, R., Tutschek, B., & Giers, G.
Affiliations
University Hospital of Bern (CH)
Corresponding author
Fischer, Johannes C.
Venue
Transfusion
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-01-07
Volume
51
Issue
7
Pages
1431-1438
ISSN
  • 0041-1132 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-2995
OpenAlex
W2105393050
Cited by
6
References
41
Citations by year
2018: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Transfusion (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Blood transfusion and management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Blood donation and transfusion practices
Keywords
residual white blood cells, flow calibration, propidium iodide, packed red blood cells, platelet concentrates, leukocyte depletion, cost reduction, detection limit
MeSH terms
Calibration, Costs and Cost Analysis, Flow Cytometry, Humans, Leukocyte Count, Plateletpheresis, Quality Control, Erythrocyte Transfusion, Leukocyte Reduction Procedures, Limit of Detection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review