The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Risk Perception of the “Mad Cow Disease” in France: Determinants and Consequences
Open accessAbstract
Since 1996, when bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) was assessed as a possible human transmissible disease, a variant of Creutzfeldt‐Jakob disease (vCJD), French people have entered into a long period of fear and avoidance of beef and bovine byproducts, which produced an unprecedented collapse in the beef market. This article deals with the perceived risk of the “mad cow disease” (MCD) in the French general population. Two surveys were conducted on a representative sample of the adult population, the first one in 2000 during the peak of the crisis and the second one 13 months later in a quieter period. The main assumption we made was that changes in beef consumption are strongly related to the perceived risk of MCD, which we defined as people's cognitive and affective responses to hazard. Our objective was to identify the determinants and consequences of this perceived risk and to compare them in different sociopolitical contexts. The results issued from a bivariate and multivariate analysis show that: (i) the distribution of most of the variables significantly related to the perceived risk identified in the first survey had changed in the second survey, in relation with the reduction of worry and the resumption of national beef consumption; (ii) the propensity for self‐protection through avoiding or ceasing beef eating was more related to feelings of worry than to subjective vCJD risk assessments; and (iii) the main determinant of less avoidance to beef products was the preference for beef, a feeling identified prior to emergence of the risk of MCD, remaining unchanged in various contexts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Slovic, P. (1987) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.3563507 · Cited by 9,271
Cited by
Martin, W. E., Martin, I. M., & Kent, B. (2009) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.09.007 · Cited by 289
Factors in vaccination intention against the pandemic influenza A/H1N1
Setbon, M., & Raude, J. (2010) · The European Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckq054 · Cited by 275
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Setbon, M., Raude, J., Fischler, C., & Flahault, A.
- Venue
- Risk Analysis
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-08
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 813-826
- ISSN
- 0272-4332 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-6924
- OpenAlex
- W2089308805
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 23.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Risk Perception of the “Mad Cow Disease” in France: Determinants and Consequences. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00634.x
- The paper
- Setbon, M., Raude, J., Fischler, C., & Flahault, A. (2005). Risk Perception of the “Mad Cow Disease” in France: Determinants and Consequences. Risk Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00634.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.