The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prevention, Adaptation, and Threat Denial: Flooding Experiences in the Netherlands
Abstract
Delta areas such as the Netherlands are more and more at risk of future flooding due to global climate change. Motivating residents living in flood‐prone areas to effectively cope with local floods may lead to minimization of material losses and loss of life. The aim of this research was to investigate whether the extent to which residents had been exposed to flooding in the past was a key factor in motivating residents to effectively cope with future flooding. We also focused on the psychological variables that mediated this relationship. We conducted a survey (N = 516) among flood victims and nonvictims. We assessed subjective experiences due to past flooding, affective and cognitive appraisals, and coping responses. Results show that victims reported stronger emotions (negative and positive), and the receipt of more social support due to past flooding than did nonvictims. Moreover, victims worry more about future flooding, perceive themselves as more vulnerable to future flooding, perceive the consequences of future flooding as more severe, and have stronger intentions to take adaptive actions in the future than nonvictims. Structural equation modeling reveals that the latter effect was fully mediated by specific experiences and appraisals. Insights into factors and processes that have the potential to motivate residents to effectively cope with future floods may prove helpful in developing interventions to inform residents how to act effectively in case of an imminent flood.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
MacKinnon, D. P., Fairchild, A. J., & Fritz, M. S. (2007) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085542 · Cited by 5,688
Byrne, B. M., Shavelson, R. J., & Muthén, B. (1989) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.105.3.456 · Cited by 4,115
Testing moderator and mediator effects in counseling psychology research.
Frazier, P. A., Tix, A. P., & Barron, K. E. (2004) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0167.51.1.115 · Cited by 4,037 · cited 1×
“(34), sense of beauty (50), stress (35), concern”
BackgroundRisk perceptions, general environmental beliefs, and willingness to address climate change
O'Connor, R. E., Bard, R. J., & Fisher, A. (1999) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1999.tb00421.x · Cited by 957
Cited by
Perception and Communication of Flood Risks: A Systematic Review of Empirical Research
Kellens, W., Terpstra, T., & De Maeyer, P. (2013) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01844.x · Cited by 759
Transformational adaptation: agriculture and climate change
Rickards, L., & Howden, S. M. (2012) · Crop & Pasture Science · doi:10.1071/cp11172 · Cited by 417
An Analysis of the Public Perception of Flood Risk on the Belgian Coast
Kellens, W., Zaalberg, R., Neutens, T., Vanneuville, W., & De Maeyer, P. (2011) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01571.x · Cited by 402
Self-citationvan der Linden, S. (2014) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2008 · Cited by 316
Terpstra, T., & Lindell, M. K. (2013) · Environment and Behavior · doi:10.1177/0013916512452427 · Cited by 269
Metadata
- Authors
- Zaalberg, R., Midden, C., Meijnders, A., & McCalley, T.
- Venue
- Risk Analysis
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-12
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1759-1778
- ISSN
- 0272-4332 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-6924
- OpenAlex
- W2018307017
- Cited by
- 298
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 4.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevention, Adaptation, and Threat Denial: Flooding Experiences in the Netherlands. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01316.x
- The paper
- Zaalberg, R., Midden, C., Meijnders, A., & McCalley, T. (2009). Prevention, Adaptation, and Threat Denial: Flooding Experiences in the Netherlands. Risk Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01316.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.