The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sex‐Ratios, Sex‐Role Spillover, and Sexual Harassment of Women at Work
Abstract
We propose that sexual harassment of women at work is often a product of sex‐role spillover, which is defined as the carryover into the workplace of gender‐based expectations for behavior that are irrelevant or inappropriate to work. We argue that, when the sex‐ratio at work is skewed—in either direction—sex‐role spillover occurs. Thus, women in male‐dominated work experience one kind of sex‐role spillover. They are “role deviates” who are treated differently from other (male) work‐role occupants; they are aware of this differential treatment, and they think it is directed at them as individual women rather than as work‐role occupants. On the other hand, women in female‐dominated work also experience sex‐role spillover but of a different kind. Sex‐role and work‐role are practically identical. These women are treated similarly to other (female) work‐role occupants, so are unaware that their treatment is based on sex‐role. Because of this, they think the treatment they receive is a function of their job; the job itself is sexualized. Data from a representative sample survey, about sexual harassment of working women in Los Angeles County, provide some support for these ideas.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Some Effects of Proportions on Group Life: Skewed Sex Ratios and Responses to Token Women
Kanter, R. M. (1977) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/226425 · Cited by 3,154
Categorical and contextual bases of person memory and stereotyping.
Taylor, S. E., Fiske, S. T., Etcoff, N. L., & Ruderman, A. J. (1978) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.36.7.778 · Cited by 1,028
Cited by
Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders.
Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.109.3.573 · Cited by 7,300
Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis.
Eagly, A. H., & Johnson, B. T. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.108.2.233 · Cited by 2,749
Eagly, A. H., Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C., & van Engen, M. L. (2003) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.4.569 · Cited by 2,547
The Leadership Styles of Women and Men
Eagly, A. H., & Johannesen‐Schmidt, M. C. (2001) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00241 · Cited by 1,367
Gender and the effectiveness of leaders: A meta-analysis.
Eagly, A. H., Karau, S. J., & Makhijani, M. G. (1995) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.117.1.125 · Cited by 1,284
Metadata
- Authors
- Gutek, B. A., & Morasch, B.
- Venue
- Journal of Social Issues
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1982-01
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 55-74
- ISSN
- 0022-4537 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-4560
- OpenAlex
- W2167671050
- Cited by
- 433
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 16.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sex‐Ratios, Sex‐Role Spillover, and Sexual Harassment of Women at Work. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1982.tb01910.x
- The paper
- Gutek, B. A., & Morasch, B. (1982). Sex‐Ratios, Sex‐Role Spillover, and Sexual Harassment of Women at Work. Journal of Social Issues. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1982.tb01910.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.