The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Leadership Styles of Women and Men
Abstract
As women increasingly enter leadership roles that traditionally have been occupied mainly by men, the possibility that the leadership styles of women and men differ continues to attract attention. The focus of these debates on sameness versus difference can obscure the array of causal factors that can produce differences or similarities. Adopting the perspective of social role theory, we offer a framework that encompasses many of the complexities of the empirical literature on the leadership styles of women and men. Supplementing Eagly and Johnson's (1990) review of the interpersonally oriented, task‐oriented, autocratic, and democratic styles of women and men, we present new data concerning the transformational, transactional, and laissez‐faire leadership styles.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders.
Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.109.3.573 · Cited by 7,300
Self-citationMen and Women of the Corporation.
Strauss, G., & Kanter, R. M. (1978) · Industrial and Labor Relations Review · doi:10.2307/2522922 · Cited by 7,288
(1990) · Free Press , Collier Macmillan eBooks · Cited by 2,859
Lowe, K. B., Kroeck, K. G., & Sivasubramaniam, N. (1996) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/s1048-9843(96)90027-2 · Cited by 2,758
Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis.
Eagly, A. H., & Johnson, B. T. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.108.2.233 · Cited by 2,749
Self-citationLeadership and Decision-Making
VROOM, V. H., & YETTON, P. W. (1973) · University of Pittsburgh Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctt6wrc8r · Cited by 2,380
Transformational leadership: industrial, military, and educational impact
(1998) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.35-4579 · Cited by 1,860
Prescriptive Gender Stereotypes and Backlash Toward Agentic Women
Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (2001) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00239 · Cited by 1,855
Interaction Process Analysis: A Method for the Study of Small Groups.
Greenwood, E., & Bales, R. F. (1950) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2086941 · Cited by 1,673
Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis.
Eagly, A. H., Makhijani, M. G., & Klonsky, B. G. (1992) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.111.1.3 · Cited by 1,662
Self-citation
Cited by
Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders.
Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.109.3.573 · Cited by 7,300
Self-citationAntonakis, J., Avolio, B. J., & Sivasubramaniam, N. (2003) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/s1048-9843(03)00030-4 · Cited by 1,533
The Contribution of Women on Boards of Directors: Going beyond the Surface
Nielsen, S., & Huse, M. (2010) · Corporate Governance: An International Review · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8683.2010.00784.x · Cited by 1,162
The Entrepreneurial Propensity of Women
Langowitz, N., & Minniti, M. (2007) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00177.x · Cited by 1,098
Jost, J. T., & Kay, A. C. (2005) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.498 · Cited by 910
Metadata
- Authors
- Eagly, A. H., & Johannesen‐Schmidt, M. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Social Issues
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-01
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 781-797
- ISSN
- 0022-4537 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-4560
- OpenAlex
- W2126980101
- Cited by
- 1,367
- References
- 34
- FWCI
- 41.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Leadership Styles of Women and Men. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/0022-4537.00241
- The paper
- Eagly, A. H., & Johannesen‐Schmidt, M. C. (2001). The Leadership Styles of Women and Men. Journal of Social Issues. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00241
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
