Cited by 185Social and Intergroup PsychologyMigration, Refugees, and IntegrationCultural Differences and Values

How Ideological Attitudes Predict Host Society Members’ Attitudes toward Immigrants: Exploring Cross-National Differences: RWA, SDO, and Attitudes toward Immigrants

Cohrs, J. Christopher, Stelzl, Monika·2010·Journal of Social Issues

Abstract

Recent theoretical frameworks assume that the ideological attitudes of right-wing authoritarianism (RWA) and social dominance orientation (SDO) predict individuals’ attitudes toward immigrant groups, and that these predictive relations are affected by contextual factors. Based on these assumptions, we conducted a meta-analysis of the relations between ideological attitudes and anti-immigrant attitudes in 155 samples from 17 countries (total N = 38,522 participants). As potential correlates of cross-national differences in these relations, socioeconomic indices, cultural worldviews, and collective perceptions of immigrants were considered. RWA was a particularly strong predictor of anti-immigrant attitudes in countries where immigrants were perceived as increasing the crime rate and as not being beneficial to the economy (e.g., Germany, Italy); and SDO was a particularly strong predictor in countries with a higher relative unemployment rate of immigrants (e.g., Belgium, Sweden). We discuss the interplay of individual and sociocultural factors and offer directions for future research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2010.01670.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Right-wing authoritarianism is linked to negative attitudes toward immigrants, particularly when immigrants are seen as a threat to collective security and safety.

    “Right-wing authoritarianism-involving conventionalism, authoritarian submission, and authoritarian aggression-has also been linked to negative attitudes toward immigrants, particularly when immigrants are seen as a threat to collective security and safety (Cohrs & Stelzl 2010).”

    From Prejudice and Discrimination Toward Immigrants (2021) · cites this paper as Cohrs & Stelzl 2010

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cohrs, J. C., & Stelzl, M.
Affiliations
  • Queen's University Belfast (GB)
  • St. Thomas University (US)
Corresponding author
Cohrs, J. Christopher
Venue
Journal of Social Issues
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-12
Volume
66
Issue
4
Pages
673-694
ISSN
0022-4537 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2121255610
Cited by
185
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 6
FWCI
34.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Social Issues (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Refugees, and Integration
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
Keywords
right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, anti-immigrant sentiment, attitudes toward immigrants, cross-national differences, perceptions of immigrants, crime perception, economic perceptions, cultural worldview

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review