How Ideological Attitudes Predict Host Society Members’ Attitudes toward Immigrants: Exploring Cross-National Differences: RWA, SDO, and Attitudes toward Immigrants
Abstract
Recent theoretical frameworks assume that the ideological attitudes of right-wing authoritarianism (RWA) and social dominance orientation (SDO) predict individuals’ attitudes toward immigrant groups, and that these predictive relations are affected by contextual factors. Based on these assumptions, we conducted a meta-analysis of the relations between ideological attitudes and anti-immigrant attitudes in 155 samples from 17 countries (total N = 38,522 participants). As potential correlates of cross-national differences in these relations, socioeconomic indices, cultural worldviews, and collective perceptions of immigrants were considered. RWA was a particularly strong predictor of anti-immigrant attitudes in countries where immigrants were perceived as increasing the crime rate and as not being beneficial to the economy (e.g., Germany, Italy); and SDO was a particularly strong predictor in countries with a higher relative unemployment rate of immigrants (e.g., Belgium, Sweden). We discuss the interplay of individual and sociocultural factors and offer directions for future research.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Right-wing authoritarianism is linked to negative attitudes toward immigrants, particularly when immigrants are seen as a threat to collective security and safety.
“Right-wing authoritarianism-involving conventionalism, authoritarian submission, and authoritarian aggression-has also been linked to negative attitudes toward immigrants, particularly when immigrants are seen as a threat to collective security and safety (Cohrs & Stelzl 2010).”
From Prejudice and Discrimination Toward Immigrants (2021) · cites this paper as Cohrs & Stelzl 2010
Cites
Esses, V. M., Jackson, L. M., & Armstrong, T. L. (1998) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1998.tb01244.x · Cited by 833 · see citing works
Who We Are and Who Can Join Us: National Identity Content and Entry Criteria for New Immigrants
Pehrson, S., & Green, E. G. T. (2010) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2010.01671.x · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Prejudice and Discrimination Toward Immigrants
Esses, V. M. (2021) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-080520-102803 · Cited by 273 · see citing works
Who We Are and Who Can Join Us: National Identity Content and Entry Criteria for New Immigrants
Pehrson, S., & Green, E. G. T. (2010) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2010.01671.x · Cited by 132 · see citing works
- Authors
- Cohrs, J. C., & Stelzl, M.
- Affiliations
- Queen's University Belfast (GB)
- St. Thomas University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Cohrs, J. Christopher
- Venue
- Journal of Social Issues
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-12
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 673-694
- ISSN
- 0022-4537 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2121255610
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 34.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Social Issues (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Refugees, and Integration
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
- Keywords
- right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, anti-immigrant sentiment, attitudes toward immigrants, cross-national differences, perceptions of immigrants, crime perception, economic perceptions, cultural worldview
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review