Cited by 256EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningSecond Language Acquisition and LearningLinguistics and Language Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Effect of Error Correction on L2 Grammar Knowledge and Oral Proficiency

DEKEYSER, ROBERT M.·1993·The Modern Language Journal

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1993.tb01999.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In all but one study (DeKeyser, 1993), CF was provided during oral interaction that was pedagogically designed to elicit target forms and create strategic opportunities for teachers to provide CF.

    “in all but one study (i.e., DeKeyser, 1993), CF was provided during oral interaction that had been pedagogically designed to elicit target forms from students and to create strategic opportunities for teachers to provide CF.”

    From ORAL FEEDBACK IN CLASSROOM SLA: A Meta-Analysis (2010) · cites this paper as DeKeyser, 1993

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 52

  1. 10.1017/S0272263100009736 · DOI
  2. 10.1007/978-3-642-74124-1 · DOI
  3. Bley‐Vroman Robert, 1988, Grammar and Second Language Teaching: A Book of Readings., 19
  4. Brown Roger, 1970, Cognition and the Development of Language., 11
  5. Carroll John B., 1981, Individual Differences and Universals in Language Learning Aptitude., 119
  6. Carroll John B., 1967, A Study of a “Model of School Learning.
  7. Carroll John B., 1959, Modern Language Aptitude Test: Form A.
  8. 10.1017/S0142716400005555 · DOI
  9. 10.1017/CBO9781139524469 · DOI
  10. Cronbach Lee J., 1977, Aptitudes and Instructional Methods: A Handbook for Research on Interactions.
  11. 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1991.tb00690.x · DOI
  12. Debeuf Ingrid“L'interaction verbale dans la classe de FLE. Une analyse de corpus.” Unpubl. BA Thesis Katholieke Univ. Leuven Belgium 1988.
  13. 10.1177/026553229000700202 · DOI
  14. Drenth Pieter J. D., 1969, VAT 1969 verbale aanleg testserie: Funkties van woorden.
  15. Ebel Robert L., 1951, Estimating the Reliability of Ratings., Psychometrika, 16, 407, 10.1007/BF02288803 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Ellis Rod, 1990, Instructed Second Language Acquisition: Learning in the Classroom.
  17. Gardner Robert C., 1985, Social Psychology and Second Language Learning: The Role of Attitude and Motivation.
  18. 10.1017/S0272263100009724 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1978.tb02409.x · DOI
  20. Herron Carol, 1988, “Learning Grammatical Structures in a Foreign Language: Modelling Versus Feedback., French Review, 61, 910
  21. Higgs Theodore V., 1982, Curriculum, Competence and the Foreign Language Teacher., 57
  22. 10.1017/S0305000900005596 · DOI
  23. Huitema Bradley E., 1980, The Analysis of Covariance and Alternatives.
  24. Krashen Stephen D., 1982, Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition.
  25. 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1982.tb06973.x · DOI
  26. Horwitz Elaine, 1991, Language Anxiety: From Theory and Research to Classroom Implications.
  27. Lee William R., 1988, Dealing with Errors: What Is the Classroom Teacher to Do, Praxis des neusprachlichen Unterrichts, 36, 115
  28. 10.1017/S0272263100009517 · DOI
  29. 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1991.tb00677.x · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1980.tb00322.x · DOI
  31. Omaggio Alice C., 1984, Teaching for Proficiency: The Organizing Principle., 43
  32. Pinker Steven, 1989, Foundations of Cognitive Science., 359, 10.7551/mitpress/3072.003.0011 · DOI
  33. 10.2307/3586206 · DOI
  34. Reber Arthur S., 1984, The Penguin Dictionary of Psychology.
  35. 10.2307/3586390 · DOI
  36. 10.1177/026765839100700202 · DOI
  37. 10.1111/j.1944-9720.1984.tb01727.x · DOI
  38. 10.1177/026765839100700204 · DOI
  39. 10.2307/3587136 · DOI
  40. Skehan Peter, 1989, Individual Differences in Second‐Language Learning.
  41. Snow Richard E., 1989, Learning and Individual Differences: Advances in Theory and Research., 13
  42. Snow Richard E., 1987, Aptitude, Learning and Instruction: Conative and Affective Process Analyses., 11
  43. 10.1037/0022-0663.76.3.347 · DOI
  44. SPSS., 1988, SPSS‐X User's Guide.
  45. 10.1017/S0272263100010317 · DOI
  46. 10.1017/S0272263100008408 · DOI
  47. 10.1017/S0142716400007827 · DOI
  48. Patten Bill, 1992, “Second‐Language‐Acquisition Research and Foreign Language Teaching, Part 2., ADFL Bulletin, 23, 23
  49. 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1988.tb00411.x · DOI
  50. Walz Joel, 1982, Error Correction Techniques for the Foreign Language Classroom.
  51. 10.1177/026765839100700205 · DOI · Paper page
  52. 10.1093/applin/12.4.416 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
DEKEYSER, R. M.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
DEKEYSER, ROBERT M.
Venue
The Modern Language Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1993-12
Volume
77
Issue
4
Pages
501-514
ISSN
  • 0026-7902 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-4781
OpenAlex
W2007510115
Cited by
256
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 17
FWCI
15.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Modern Language Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and Language Analysis
Keywords
error correction, second language grammar, grammatical knowledge, speaking skills, second language acquisition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review