The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Restructuring Classroom Interaction with Networked Computers: Effects on Quantity and Characteristics of Language Production
Abstract
This study describes the use of Daedalus InterChange, a local area computer network application, to facilitate communicative language use through synchronous, written classroom interaction. The study compares the quantity and characteristics of the discourse produced by two groups of second‐semester French students during an InterChange session and during an oral class discussion on the same topic. Students had over twice as many turns, produced two to four times more sentences, and used a much greater variety of discourse functions when working in InterChange than they did in their oral discussion. Furthermore, the distribution and direction of turns were radically different in the two conditions, with much more direct student‐to‐student exchange in the InterChange condition. Students' and instructors' responses to using InterChange were assessed: both groups responded favorably, although students more enthusiastically so than the instructors. Features of InterChange that may be unsettling for teachers include: decentering of teacher authority, lesser attention to grammatical accuracy, and less clear coherence and continuity of discussions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Group Work, Interlanguage Talk, and Second Language Acquisition
Long, M. H., & Porter, P. A. (1985) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3586827 · Cited by 901
"Information Gap" Tasks: Do They Facilitate Second Language Acquisition?
Doughty, C., & Pica, T. (1986) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3586546 · Cited by 498
Cited by
Technologies for foreign language learning: a review of technology types and their effectiveness
Golonka, E. M., Bowles, A. R., Frank, V. M., Richardson, D. L., & Freynik, S. (2014) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2012.700315 · Cited by 1,144
Computer‐Mediated Collaborative Learning: Theory and Practice
WARSCHAUER, M. (1997) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.1997.tb05514.x · Cited by 1,042
Artifacts and cultures-of-use in intercultural communication
Thorne, S. L. (2003) · Language Learning & Technology · doi:10.64152/10125/25200 · Cited by 573
“Research in computer-mediated communication and technology-oriented second language acquisition (SLA) has begun to illuminate many of the linguistic, interactional, and interpersonal dimensions to language-based interaction as they pertain to learning and development (e.g., Blake, 2000; Chun, 1994; Herring, 1996; Kern…”
BackgroundPayne, J. S., & Whitney, P. J. (2003) · CALICO Journal · doi:10.1558/cj.v20i1.7-32 · Cited by 512
The Use of Technology for Second Language Learning and Teaching: A Retrospective
Salaberry, M. R. (2001) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/0026-7902.00096 · Cited by 465
Metadata
- Authors
- KERN, R. G.
- Venue
- The Modern Language Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-12
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 457-476
- ISSN
- 0026-7902 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-4781
- OpenAlex
- W2012522902
- Cited by
- 866
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 63.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Restructuring Classroom Interaction with Networked Computers: Effects on Quantity and Characteristics of Language Production. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1995.tb05445.x
- The paper
- KERN, R. G. (1995). Restructuring Classroom Interaction with Networked Computers: Effects on Quantity and Characteristics of Language Production. The Modern Language Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1995.tb05445.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.