Effects of Multimedia Annotations on Vocabulary Acquisition
Abstract
Research on second language (L2) vocabulary acquisition has revealed that words associated with actual objects or imagery techniques are learned more easily than those without. With multimedia applications, it is possible to provide, in addition to traditional definitions of words, different types of information, such as pictures and videos. Thus, one of the fundamental research questions posed in the use of multimedia systems is: How effective are annotations with different media types for vocabulary acquisition? This article discusses the results of three studies done with 160 university German students using CyberBuch, a hypermedia application for reading German texts that contains a variety of annotations for words in the form of text, pictures, and video. The issues examined are related to (a) how well vocabulary is learned incidentally when the goal is reading comprehension, (b) the effectiveness of different types of annotations for vocabulary acquisition, and (c) the relationship between look-up behavior and performance on vocabulary tests. The results showed a higher rate of incidental learning than expected (25% accuracy on production tests, 77% on recognition tests), significantly higher scores for words that were annotated with pictures + text than for those with video + text or text only, and a correlation between looking up a certain annotation type and using this type as the retrieval cue for remembering words.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Research findings have provided evidence of the superior effects of various types of advance organizers used to facilitate reading comprehension.
“Research findings have provided evidence of the superior effects of various types of advance organizers used to facilitate reading comprehension.”
From Reading authentic EFL text using visualization and advance organizers in a multimedia learning environment (2007) · cites this paper as Chun and Plass (1996)
The target words were new to all the subjects.
“Most importantly, the target words were new to all the subjects.5”
From Some empirical evidence for the involvement load hypothesis in vocabulary acquisition (2001) · cites this paper as [5]
Cites
Mayer, R. E., & Anderson, R. B. (1992) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.84.4.444 · Cited by 1,000 · see citing works
Erdelyi, M. H., & Becker, J. (1974) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(74)90008-5 · Cited by 306 · see citing works
Reversed Subtitling and Dual Coding Theory: New Directions for Foreign Language Instruction
Danan, M. (1992) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1992.tb01042.x · Cited by 222 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Facebook: An online environment for learning of English in institutions of higher education?
Kabilan, M. K., Ahmad, N., & Abidin, M. J. Z. (2010) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.07.003 · Cited by 858 · see citing works
Some empirical evidence for the involvement load hypothesis in vocabulary acquisition
Hulstijn, J. H., & Laufer, B. (2001) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/0023-8333.00164 · Cited by 819 · see citing works
Ranalli, J. (2008) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588220802447859 · Cited by 269 · see citing works
Modality of input and vocabulary acquisition
Syodorenko, T. (2010) · Language Learning & Technology · doi:10.64152/10125/44214 · Cited by 250 · see citing works
Nakata, T. (2011) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2010.520675 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
Lexical Input Processing and Vocabulary Learning
Barcroft, J. (2015) · Language Learning & Language Teaching · doi:10.1075/lllt.43 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Lin, H., & Chen, T. (2007) · Language Learning & Technology · doi:10.64152/10125/44119 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
“In their study looking into how the use of a dynamic visual advance organizer can facilitate reading comprehension of L2 learners, Chun and Plass (1996) indicated that a dynamic visual advance organizer is effective on the macro level of processing while reading.”
BackgroundMoreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2010) · Cognitive Load Theory · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511844744.010 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
- Authors
- CHUN, D. M., & PLASS, J. L.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
- Corresponding author
- CHUN, DOROTHY M.
- PLASS, JAN L.
- Venue
- The Modern Language Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1996-06
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 183-198
- ISSN
- 0026-7902 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-4781
- OpenAlex
- W2016414194
- Cited by
- 759
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 50 · 2014: 54 · 2013: 45 · 2012: 47
- FWCI
- 12.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Modern Language Journal (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Subtitles and Audiovisual Media
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Keywords
- multimedia annotation, vocabulary acquisition, second language vocabulary, incidental learning, video annotation, German as a second language, retrieval cues, reading comprehension
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review