Cited by 341Second Language Acquisition and LearningEFL/ESL Teaching and LearningReading and Literacy Development

Second Language Vocabulary Learning: The Role of Context versus Translations as a Function of Proficiency

PRINCE, PETER·1996·The Modern Language Journal

Abstract

A widespread view of vocabulary learning is that it is advisable to make the shift away from learning words with their translations and to rely on second language (L2) context as soon as possible. Such faith in context learning has not always received experimental support, however, nor is it commonly shared by L2 learners. An experiment in which subjects were tested on their recall of newly learned words was conducted to determine the relative advantages and disadvantages of both context learning and translation learning as a function of learner proficiency. Results reveal a superiority of translation learning in terms of quantity, but an inability on the part of weaker learners to transfer their knowledge into L2 contexts. The possible reasons for this are discussed, and it is suggested that alternative learning strategies that combine the advantages of the two techniques should be explored.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1996.tb05468.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prince found translation-based learning to be more effective than sentence-level contextual learning.

    “In another L2 lexical study, Prince (1996) found translation-based learning to be more effective than sentence-level contextual learning”

    From Effects of sentence writing in second language lexical acquisition (2004) · cites this paper as Prince (1996)

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 41 · Cited by 341

Authors
PRINCE, P.
Affiliations
Université de Provence Aix-Marseille I (FR)
Corresponding author
PRINCE, PETER
Venue
The Modern Language Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1996-12
Volume
80
Issue
4
Pages
478-493
ISSN
  • 0026-7902 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-4781
OpenAlex
W2099696926
Cited by
341
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 17
FWCI
6.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Modern Language Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
Keywords
second language vocabulary acquisition, contextual learning, translation learning, learner proficiency, word recall, vocabulary acquisition strategies, knowledge transfer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review