The Relationship Between Second Language Acquisition Theory and Computer‐Assisted Language Learning
Abstract
The point of departure for this article is the contrast between the theoretical landscape within view of language teaching professionals in 1991 and that of today. I argue that the pragmatic goal of computer‐assisted language learning (CALL) developers and researchers to create and evaluate learning opportunities pushes them to consider a variety of theoretical approaches to second language acquisition (SLA), which have developed, in part, in response to the need to theorize the role of instruction in SLA. To illustrate connections between SLA and CALL, I touch on multiple theoretical perspectives grouped into four general approaches: cognitive linguistic (Universal Grammar, autonomous induction theory, and the concept‐oriented approach); psycholinguistic (processibility theory, input processing theory, interactionist theory); human learning (associative–cognitive CREED, skill acquisition theory); and language in social context (sociocultural, language socialization, conversation analysis, systemic–functional, complexity theory). I suggest that such theoretical approaches can be useful in the development and evaluation of CALL materials and tasks. Finally, I propose that the expanding use of technology changes the nature of communicative competence theory, challenges SLA theory, and increases the number of consumers for SLA research.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
CALL tools were initially adopted for the creation of supplementary materials before being integrated into core instructional and assessment practices, a process that typically spanned 10-15 years.
“Chapelle (2009) noted that CALL tools were initially adopted for the creation of supplementary materials before being integrated into core instructional and assessment practices, a process that typically spanned 10-15 years.”
From Adoption and Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Foreign Language Teaching: Multi-Institutional Analysis of Higher Education (2026) · cites this paper as Chapelle (2009)
Cites
Materials Development in Language Teaching
(2011) · doi:10.1017/9781139042789 · Cited by 1,391 · see citing works
Artifacts and cultures-of-use in intercultural communication
Thorne, S. L. (2003) · Language Learning & Technology · doi:10.64152/10125/25200 · Cited by 573 · cited 2× · see citing works
“It follows that pedagogy should be designed in a way that keeps the communication flowing without fatal breakdowns caused by conflicting activity systems among participants (Russell, 2001; Thorne, 2003).”
BackgroundTheory Construction in Second Language Acquisition
Jordan, G. (2004) · Language Learning & Language Teaching · doi:10.1075/lllt.8 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bedenlier, S., Bond, M., Buntins, K., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Kerres, M. (2020) · Australasian Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.14742/ajet.5477 · Cited by 270 · see citing works
Ayedoun, E., Hayashi, Y., & Seta, K. (2019) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-018-0171-6 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
The use of massively multiplayer online role-playing games in CALL: an analysis of research
Peterson, M. (2016) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2016.1197949 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Arabic as a heritage language: A scoping review
Visonà, M. W., & Plonsky, L. (2020) · International Journal of Bilingualism · doi:10.1177/1367006919849110 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Davin, K. J., Kissau, S., Haudeck, H., Ade-Thurow, B., Gómez-Pereira, D., Oon, P. T., & Dornburg, A. (2026) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2025.103901 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Karadağ, E., Calışkan, N., Çiftçi, Ş. S., & Polat, M. (2026) · Journal of Narrative and Language Studies · doi:10.59045/nalans.2026.93
- Authors
- CHAPELLE, C. A.
- Affiliations
- Iowa State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- CHAPELLE, CAROL A.
- ORCID
- CHAPELLE, CAROL A.
- Venue
- The Modern Language Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-12
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- s1
- Pages
- 741-753
- ISSN
- 0026-7902 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-4781
- OpenAlex
- W2015659803
- Cited by
- 301
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 85.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Modern Language Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › English Language Learning and Teaching
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Keywords
- second language acquisition theory, computer-assisted language learning, universal grammar, interactionist theory, creeds, skill acquisition theory, sociocultural theory, language socialization, conversation analysis, systemic functional linguistics, complexity theory, communicative competence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review