Cited by 128Speech and dialogue systemsIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningEFL/ESL Teaching and Learning

Adding communicative and affective strategies to an embodied conversational agent to enhance second language learners' willingness to communicate

Open access
Ayedoun, Emmanuel, Hayashi, Yuki, Seta, Kazuhisa·2019·International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education

Abstract

This paper describes an embodied conversational agent enhanced with specific conversational strategies aiming to foster learners’ readiness towards communication in a second language (L2). Willingness to communicate (WTC) in a second language is believed to have a direct and sustained influence on learners’ actual usage frequency of the target language. To help overcome the lack of suitable environments for increasing L2 learners’ WTC, our approach is to build embodied conversational agents that can help learners surmount their apprehension towards communication in L2. Here, we focus on the dialogue management aspects of our approach and propose a model based on a set of communication strategies (CS) and affective backchannels (AB) to foster such agents’ ability to carry on natural and WTC-friendly conversations with learners. We examined learners’ expected WTC after interacting with one of the following versions of the system: an agent featuring both CS and AB; an agent featuring only CS; and an agent featuring only AB. The results suggested that combining CS and AB empowers the conversational agent and leads to higher expected WTC among L2 learners. We also found that even the AB-only version of the system had the potential to enhance WTC to some extent. These findings are evidence of the feasibility of enhancing L2 learners’ engagement towards communication using a computer-based environment coupled with appropriate conversational strategies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40593-018-0171-6

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 72 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Compton, L. (2004). Using text chat to improve willingness to communicate. In J-B Son (Ed.). Computer- Assisted Language Learning: Concepts, Contexts and Practices, 123-144, New York: iUniverse, Inc.
  2. Harlow, Essex: Pearson Education Limited.
  3. Ito, K. (2000). Cooperative strategies by elementary and intermediate level Japanese language learners, bulletin of the international student center Gifu University, 38-52.
  4. Johnson, W. L., & Valente, A. (2008). Tactical Language and Culture Training Systems: Using Artificial Intelligence to Teach Foreign Languages and Cultures. In AAAI (pp. 1632-1639).
  5. Wachsmuth & G. Knoblich (Eds.), ZiF research group international workshop. LNCS (LNAI), 4930 (pp. 18-37). Heidelberg: Springer.
  6. Matsuoka, R. (2006). Willingness to communicate in English among Japanese college students. Proceedings of the 9th Conference of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics. 165-176.
  7. McCroskey, J. C. (1997). Willingness to communicate, communication apprehension, and self perceived communication competence: Conceptualizations and perspectives. In J. Daly et al. (Eds.), Avoiding communication: Shyness, Reticence, & Communication Apprehension (pp. 75-129). Cresskill: Hampton Press.
  8. Ockert, D. (2012). Do Japanese JHS students have ideal L2 selves? Evidence from research in progress on the influence of multimedia use on affective variables. In A. Stewart & N. Sonda (Eds.), JALT2011 conference proceedings. Tokyo: JALT.
  9. Rickel, J., & Johnson, L. (1998). Animated pedagogical agents for team training. In Proceedings of the ITS Workshop on Pedagogical Agents (Vol. 75, p. 77). San Antonio, Texas.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ayedoun, E., Hayashi, Y., & Seta, K.
Affiliations
Osaka Prefecture University (JP)
Corresponding author
Ayedoun, Emmanuel
Venue
International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-03
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
29-57
ISSN
1560-4292 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2887720395
Cited by
128
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1
FWCI
2.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (18H03345, 18J22445)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Keywords
embodied conversational agents, willingness to communicate, second language acquisition, communication strategies, dialogue management, computer-assisted language learning, student engagement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review