The DOI matches its Crossref record; 64 of the 64 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Suprasegmental Measures of Accentedness and Judgments of Language Learner Proficiency in Oral English
Abstract
In high‐stakes oral proficiency testing as well as in everyday encounters, accent is the most salient aspect of nonnative speech. Prior studies of English language learners’ (ELLs’) pronunciation have focused on single parameters of English, such as vowel duration, fundamental frequency as related to intonation, or temporal measures of speech production. The present study addresses a constellation of suprasegmental characteristics of nonnative speakers of accented English, combining indices of speech rate, pause, and intonation. It examines relations between those acoustic measures of accentedness and listeners’ impressions of second‐language oral proficiency. Twenty‐six speech samples elicited from iBT TOEFL®examinees were analyzed using a KayPENTAX Computerized Speech Laboratory. Monolingual U.S. undergraduates (n = 188) judged the speakers’ oral proficiency and comprehensibility. A multiple regression analysis revealed the individual and joint predictiveness of each of the suprasegmental measures. The innovative aspect of this study lies in the fact that the multiple features of accentedness were measured via instrumentation rather than being rated by judges who may, themselves, be subject to rating biases. The suprasegmental measures collectively accounted for 50% of the variance in oral proficiency and comprehensibility ratings, even without taking into consideration other aspects of oral performance or of rater predilections.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gumperz, J. J. (1982) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511611834 · Cited by 5,861
Speaking: from intention to articulation
(1989) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-1947 · Cited by 5,003
Speaking: From Intention to Articulation
Levelt, W. J. M. (1989) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/6393.001.0001 · Cited by 4,804
Speaking. From Intention to Articulation
Caplan, D. (1990) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/0166-2236(90)90151-y · Cited by 4,008
Teaching English as a second or foreign language
Celce‐Murcia, M. (1991) · Cited by 2,912
Foreign Accent, Comprehensibility, and Intelligibility in the Speech of Second Language Learners
Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M. (1995) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1995.tb00963.x · Cited by 1,545
English with an Accent: Language Ideology and Discrimination in the United States
Wolfram, W., & Lippi-Green, R. (1999) · Language · doi:10.2307/417270 · Cited by 1,534
Psycholinguistics: Experiments in spontaneous speech
Goldman-Eisler, F. (1968) · MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) · Cited by 1,215
Speech style and social evaluation
Giles, H., & Powesland, P. F. (1975) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,192
Prosody in the Comprehension of Spoken Language: A Literature Review
Cutler, A., Dahan, D., & van Donselaar, W. (1997) · Language and Speech · doi:10.1177/002383099704000203 · Cited by 1,066
Cited by
The Effectiveness of Second Language Pronunciation Instruction: A Meta-Analysis
Lee, J., Jang, J., & Plonsky, L. (2015) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/amu040 · Cited by 431
Relative salience of suprasegmental features on judgments of L2 comprehensibility and accentedness
Kang, O. (2010) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2010.01.005 · Cited by 327
Self-citationSaito, K., & Plonsky, L. (2019) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/lang.12345 · Cited by 282
Kahng, J. (2014) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/lang.12084 · Cited by 200
Fluency in Second Language Testing: Insights From Different Disciplines
De Jong, N. H. (2018) · Language Assessment Quarterly · doi:10.1080/15434303.2018.1477780 · Cited by 139
Metadata
- Authors
- KANG, O., RUBIN, D., & PICKERING, L.
- Venue
- The Modern Language Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-10-04
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 554-566
- ISSN
- 0026-7902 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-4781
- OpenAlex
- W2103651905
- Cited by
- 347
- References
- 64
- FWCI
- 6.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Suprasegmental Measures of Accentedness and Judgments of Language Learner Proficiency in Oral English. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2010.01091.x
- The paper
- KANG, O., RUBIN, D., & PICKERING, L. (2010). Suprasegmental Measures of Accentedness and Judgments of Language Learner Proficiency in Oral English. The Modern Language Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2010.01091.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.