Ambivalence About Communicating in a Second Language: A Qualitative Study of French Immersion Students’ Willingness to Communicate
Abstract
The defining feature of immersion language learning is the omnipresent pressure to communicate in the second language (L2), even as incipient skills are being acquired. This study uses the focused essay technique to investigate ambivalence about communicating among adolescent French immersion students (12–14 years of age). Students described situations in which they were most willing to communicate (241 entries received) and situations in which they were least willing to communicate (179 entries received). Responses reveal complex interrelations among linguistic development, L2 self‐development, and the nonlinguistic issues that typically face adolescents. Most frequently, students discussed communication with teachers and friends in a school context, but other entries described situations outside the classroom, with extended family or encounters with media. Perceived competence and error correction were identified as major issues. Students also described feeling excluded or mocked because of their status as immersion students, but at other times they used language to form a secret club to exclude or poke fun at other people. Although we found substantial similarities between situations in which students are most or least willing to communicate, they can be differentiated by subtle changes in context that affect the authenticity of communication and needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Willingness to communicate could considerably impact learners' interaction behaviour.
“Also, willingness to communicate (WTC), which concerns 'the probability that a learner will USE the language in authentic interaction' (emphasis in original: MacIntyre et al. 1998: 558), could considerably impact learners' interaction behaviour (see MacIntyre, Burns & Jessome 2011).”
From Interaction and instructed second language acquisition (2018) · cites this paper as MacIntyre, Burns & Jessome 2011
Cites
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68 · Cited by 27,815 · see citing works
Deci, E. L. (1975) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-4446-9 · Cited by 2,911 · see citing works
CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK AND LEARNER UPTAKE: Negotiation of Form in Communicative Classrooms
Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263197001034 · Cited by 2,259 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The students in our study wrote often about their reactions to error correction from the teacher (see Lyster, 1998; Lyster & Ranta, 1997).”
BackgroundWhy are you learning a second language? Motivational orientations and self-determination theory
Noels, K. A., Pelletier, L. G., Clément, R., & Vallerand, R. J. (2000) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/0023-8333.00111 · Cited by 1,233 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The two faces of Janus? Anxiety and enjoyment in the foreign language classroom
Dewaele, J.-M., & MacIntyre, P. D. (2014) · Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching · doi:10.14746/ssllt.2014.4.2.5 · Cited by 1,757 · see citing works
Self-citationMacintyre, P. D., & Legatto, J. J. (2011) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/amq037 · Cited by 455 · see citing works
Self-citationInteraction and instructed second language acquisition
Loewen, S., & Sato, M. (2018) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444818000125 · Cited by 377 · see citing works
Situated willingness to communicate in an L2: Interplay of individual characteristics and context
Yashima, T., MacIntyre, P. D., & Ikeda, M. (2018) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168816657851 · Cited by 217 · see citing works
Self-citationExpanding the theoretical base for the dynamics of willingness to communicate
MacIntyre, P. (2020) · Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching · doi:10.14746/ssllt.2020.10.1.6 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- MACINTYRE, P. D., BURNS, C., & JESSOME, A.
- Affiliations
- Cape Breton University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- MACINTYRE, PETER D.
- BURNS, CAROLYN
- JESSOME, ALISON
- ORCID
- MACINTYRE, PETER D.
- Venue
- The Modern Language Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-02-24
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 81-96
- ISSN
- 0026-7902 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-4781
- OpenAlex
- W2074930895
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 49.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Modern Language Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Second Language Learning and Teaching
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › French Language Learning Methods
- Keywords
- French immersion, willingness to communicate, second language communication, adolescent students, perceived competence, error correction, social exclusion, peer teasing, language development, autonomy, competence, relatedness, teacher-student communication
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review