The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 64 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Modeling Teacher Beliefs and Practices in Context: A Multimethods Approach
Abstract
This study investigates the relationship among Japanese high school teachers’ beliefs, their practices, and socioeducational factors regarding communicative language teaching (CLT). A multimethods approach was used consisting of a survey, interviews, and class observations. A Teacher Beliefs Questionnaire was sent to 188 randomly selected Japanese high schools, and 139 teachers responded. Additionally, 12 English classes taught by 4 Japanese high school teachers were observed, focusing on how they used communicative activities. The same 4 teachers were later interviewed. A path model based on Borg's (2003) conceptual framework of teacher cognition was tested. The best‐fitting model indicated that Student‐Related Communicative Conditions directly impacted Classroom Practices, Positive CLT Beliefs indirectly influenced Classroom Practices via CLT Self‐Efficacy, and Exam‐Related Expectations both directly and indirectly affected Classroom Practices. Findings from the interviews and observations revealed that the participants’ learning experiences, in‐service training, and contextual factors (e.g., university entrance examinations) influenced their beliefs and practices.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Nor do Nishino's (2012) observations of four Japanese teachers (3 of each teacher, 12 observations in total) appear to have fed into the interview questions she asked.”
From Language Teachers’ Self-efficacy Beliefs: A Review of the Literature (2005-2016) (2018) · cites this paper as Nishino's (2012)
Citations
Cites
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1983) · Cited by 79,882
Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change
Bandura, A. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191 · Cited by 43,925
Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling
Tabri, N., & Elliott, C. M. (2012) · Canadian Graduate Journal of Sociology and Criminology · doi:10.15353/cgjsc.v1i1.3787 · Cited by 39,094
(1998) · Cited by 36,049
Teachers' beliefs and educational research: cleaning up a messy construct
Pajares, M. F. (1992) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543062003307 · Cited by 9,007
Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy
Frazier, S., & Brown, H. D. (2001) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587655 · Cited by 6,226
Teacher Efficacy: Its Meaning and Measure
Tschannen‐Moran, M., Hoy, A. W., & Hoy, W. K. (1998) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543068002202 · Cited by 4,925
Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences
Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2003) · Journal of Educational Measurement · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2003.tb01103.x · Cited by 4,490
Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2001) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511667305 · Cited by 4,414
Teacher efficacy: A construct validation.
Gibson, S., & Dembo, M. H. (1984) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.76.4.569 · Cited by 3,426
Research works printed but not linked: 16
- Arbuckle J. L., 2007, Amos 7.0J Users’ Guide
- Burns A., 1996, Teacher learning in language teaching, 154
- Freeman D., 1996, Teacher learning in language teaching, 221
- Guest M., 2006, JALT 2005 Conference Proceedings, 1182
- Ho W. I., 2003, English language teaching in East Asia today
- Imura M., 2003, Nippon no eigo kyouiku nihyaku nen
- MEXT, 1989, Kootoogakkoo gakushuu shidoo yooryoo
- MEXT, 1999, Kootoogakkoo gakushuu shidoo yooryoo
- MEXT, 2003, Regarding the establishment of an action plan to cultivate “Japanese with English abilities.”
- MEXT, 2006, Gakkou kihon chousa
- Murai M., 2008, Daigaku ikinokori kyoso
- Nishino T., 2007, Japanese high school teachers’ beliefs and practices
- Richards J. C., 1998, Beyond training, 173
- Sato K., 2005, JALT 2004 Conference Proceedings, 150
- Shin‐eiken, 2008, Eigo kyouin shidouryoku koujou kenshuu ni tsuite no ankeeto, 10
- Yoshida K., 2003, Language education policy in Japan: The problem of espoused objectives versus practice, Modern Language Journal, 87, 290
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Theorizing and Studying the Language‐Teaching Mind: Mapping Research on Language Teacher Cognition
Burns, A. M., Freeman, D. J., & Edwards, E. (2015) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/modl.12245 · Cited by 233
Farrell, T. S. C. (2015) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168815617335 · Cited by 186
Batane, T., & Ngwako, A. D. (2016) · Australasian Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.14742/ajet.2299 · Cited by 139
Choi, E., & Lee, J. (2016) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2016.02.010 · Cited by 99
Metadata
- Authors
- NISHINO, T.
- Affiliations
- Kanda University of International Studies (JP)
- Corresponding author
- NISHINO, TAKAKO
- Venue
- The Modern Language Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-09
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 380-399
- ISSN
- 0026-7902 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-4781
- OpenAlex
- W2162645950
- Cited by
- 131
- References
- 64
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 42.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Modern Language Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Second Language Learning and Teaching
- Keywords
- teacher beliefs, communicative language teaching, English language teaching, secondary school teachers, Japanese teachers, teacher cognition, teaching practice, continuing teacher education, college entrance examination, path analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review