Cited by 3,426Teacher Education and Leadership StudiesEducation, Achievement, and GiftednessSchool Leadership and Teacher Performance

Teacher efficacy: A construct validation.

Gibson, Sherri, Dembo, Myron H.·1984·Journal of Educational Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-0663.76.4.569

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gibson, S., & Dembo, M. H.
Venue
Journal of Educational Psychology
Published
1984-08
Volume
76
Issue
4
Pages
569-582
ISSN
  • 0022-0663 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2176
OpenAlex
W2017985953
Cited by
3,426
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 65 · 2025: 110 · 2024: 80 · 2023: 129 · 2022: 140 · 2021: 145 · 2020: 175 · 2019: 190 · 2018: 150 · 2017: 160 · 2016: 217 · 2015: 177 · 2014: 183 · 2013: 175 · 2012: 178
FWCI
30.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Leadership and Teacher Performance
Keywords
teacher self-efficacy, construct validation, construct definition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review