Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 208

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

I. INTRODUCTION: RECONCEPTUALIZING THE NATURE OF CHILDREN’S CONCEPTUAL STRUCTURES AND THEIR DELOVEPMENT IN MIDDLE CHILDHOOD

Open access
Case, Robbie·2008·Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development

Abstract

Robbie CaseThe first theorist to articulate a general theory of intellectual development in the post-Darwinian era was James Mark Baldwin (1894/1968).According to Baldwin's theory, children's thought progressed through a sequence of four universal stages, which he termed the stages of "sensorimotor," "quasi-logical," "logical," and "hyperlogical" thought.In any given stage, Baldwin believed that new experience was "assimilated" to the existing form of thought, much in the manner that the hody assimilates food.He saw transition from one form of thought to the next as driven hy "accommodation," a process by which existing habits or schemata are broken down and then reorganized into new and more adaptive patterns.Although Baldwin was the first to articulate a general theory of cognitive development, it was Piaget's (1960, 1970) reworking of Baldwin's theory that had the greatest impact on the field.The most important feature that Piaget added to Baldwin's theory was the notion of a "logical structure," that is. a coherent set of logical operations that can he applied to any domain of human activity and to which any cognitive task in the domain must ultimately be assimilated.Piaget hypothesized that the form of children's operational structures is different at different stages of their development and that this gives their thought at each stage a unique character.To highlight the importance of these operational structures, he relabeled Baldwin's second and third stages of development, calling them the stages of "preoperational" and "operational" thought, respectively.He also divided the stage of operational thought into the "concrete" and "formal" periods.Piaget spent a good deal of effort explicating the process that Baldwin had labeled "accommodation": that is, tbe process by which low-level opera-

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1540-5834.1996.tb00535.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 208

Metadata

Authors
Case, R.
Venue
Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development
Published
1996-01
Volume
61
Issue
1-2
Pages
1-26
ISSN
  • 0037-976X (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-5834
OpenAlex
W2026889046
Cited by
208
References
0
FWCI
2.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: I. INTRODUCTION: RECONCEPTUALIZING THE NATURE OF CHILDREN’S CONCEPTUAL STRUCTURES AND THEIR DELOVEPMENT IN MIDDLE CHILDHOOD. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1540-5834.1996.tb00535.x
The paper
Case, R. (2008). I. INTRODUCTION: RECONCEPTUALIZING THE NATURE OF CHILDREN’S CONCEPTUAL STRUCTURES AND THEIR DELOVEPMENT IN MIDDLE CHILDHOOD. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5834.1996.tb00535.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.