The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Customer Empowerment in New Product Development*
Open accessAbstract
The traditional new product development (NPD) model, in which companies are exclusively responsible for coming up with new product ideas and for deciding which products should ultimately be marketed, is increasingly being challenged by innovation management academics and practitioners alike. In particular, many have advocated the idea of democratizing innovation by empowering customers to take a much more active stake in corporate NPD. This has become feasible because the Internet now allows companies to build strong online communities through which they can listen to and integrate thousands of customers from all over the world. Extant research has provided strong arguments that indicate that customer empowerment in NPD enables firms to develop better products and at the same time to reduce costs and risks if customers in a given domain are willing and able to deliver valuable input. Customer empowerment, however, not only affects the firm's internal NPD processes as reflected in the products that are ultimately marketed. Instead, it might also affect the way companies are perceived in the marketplace (by customers who observe that companies foster customer empowerment in NPD). This paper provides the first empirical study to explore how customers from the “periphery” (i.e., the mass that does not participate) perceive customer empowerment strategies. Customer empowerment in NPD is conceptualized along two basic dimensions: (1) customer empowerment to create (ideas for) new product designs; and (2) customer empowerment to select the product designs to be produced. Therefore, customers may be empowered to submit (ideas for) new products (empowerment to create) or (2) to “vote” on which products should ultimately be marketed (empowerment to select). In the course of two experimental studies using three different product categories (T-shirts, furniture, and bicycles) both customer empowerment dimensions (as well as its interaction) are found to lead to (1) increased levels of perceived customer orientation, (2) more favorable corporate attitudes, (3) and stronger behavioral intentions. These findings will be very useful to researchers and managers interested in understanding the enduring consequences of customer empowerment in NPD. Most importantly, the results suggest that empowerment strategies might be used to improve a firm's corporate associations as perceived by the broad mass of (potential) customers. In particular, marketers might foster customer empowerment as an effective means of enhancing perceived customer orientation. Customers will in turn provide rewards, as they will form more favorable corporate attitudes and will be more likely to choose the products of empowering as opposed to nonempowering companies, ceteris paribus. Customer empowerment thus constitutes a promising positioning strategy that managers can pursue to create a competitive advantage in the marketplace.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Behavioral Consequences of Service Quality
Zeithaml, V. A., Berry, L. L., & Parasuraman, A. (1996) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/1251929 · Cited by 12,003
von Hippel, E. (2005) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/2333.001.0001 · Cited by 3,768
The Ties That Bind: Measuring the Strength of Consumers’ Emotional Attachments to Brands
Thomson, M., MacInnis, D. J., & Whan Park, C. (2005) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15327663jcp1501_10 · Cited by 2,713
Kirca, A. H., Jayachandran, S., & Bearden, W. O. (2005) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.69.2.24.60761 · Cited by 2,182
Building Corporate Associations: Consumer Attributions for Corporate Socially Responsible Programs
Ellen, P. S. (2006) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1177/0092070305284976 · Cited by 1,591 · cited 1×
“Second, positive corporate associations have also been found to create a basis for strong behavioral outcomes such as purchase intentions and loyalty (Beatty and Ritter, 1986; Brown and Dacin, 1997; Ellen, Webb, and Mohr, 2006; Milgrom and Roberts, 1982).”
BackgroundCollaborating to create: The Internet as a platform for customer engagement in product innovation
Sawhney, M., Verona, G., & Prandelli, E. (2005) · Journal of Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1002/dir.20046 · Cited by 1,406
Perceived risk: Further considerations for the marketing discipline
Stone, R. N., & Grønhaug, K. (1993) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/03090569310026637 · Cited by 1,348 · cited 1×
“…level of engineering (alphas for all three product categories (cid:2) .78) and perceived risk (overall perceived risk is operationalized as an index formed by three major components of risk, namely, financial, functional, and physical risk; cf Jacoby and Kaplan, 1972; Stone and Gronhaug, 1993).”
BackgroundLead User Analyses for the Development of New Industrial Products
Urban, G. L., & von Hippel, E. (1988) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.34.5.569 · Cited by 1,125
Designing Virtual Customer Environments for New Product Development: Toward a Theory
Nambisan, S. (2002) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2002.7389914 · Cited by 1,026
The defensive consumer: Advertising deception, defensive processing, and distrust
Darke, P. R., & Ritchie, R. J. B. (2007) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.44.1.114 · Cited by 609
Cited by
Poetz, M. K., & Schreier, M. (2012) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00893.x · Cited by 1,244
Self-citationCrowdsourcing: A Review and Suggestions for Future Research
Ghezzi, A., Gabelloni, D., Martini, A., & Natalicchio, A. (2018) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/ijmr.12135 · Cited by 353
Schreier, M., Fuchs, C., & Dahl, D. W. (2012) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jm.10.0462 · Cited by 293
Self-citationSaeed, S., Yousafzai, S. Y., & Engelen, A. (2014) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1111/etap.12097 · Cited by 269
The effect of atmosphere on customer engagement in upscale hotels: an application of S-O-R paradigm
Choi, H., & Kandampully, J. (2019) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2018.06.012 · Cited by 257
Metadata
- Authors
- Fuchs, C., & Schreier, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Product Innovation Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-12-16
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 17-32
- ISSN
- 0737-6782 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1932534887
- Cited by
- 575
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 71.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Customer Empowerment in New Product Development*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2010.00778.x
- The paper
- Fuchs, C., & Schreier, M. (2011). Customer Empowerment in New Product Development*. Journal of Product Innovation Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2010.00778.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.