Cited by 680Psychometric Methodologies and TestingPolitical Theory and DemocracyPolitical Conflict and Governance

Democracy as a Latent Variable

Treier, Shawn, Jackman, Simon·2008·American Journal of Political Science

Abstract

We apply formal, statistical measurement models to the Polity indicators, used widely in studies of international relations to measure democracy. In so doing, we make explicit the hitherto implicit assumptions underlying scales built using the Polity indicators. Modeling democracy as a latent variable allows us to assess the “noise” (measurement error) in the resulting measure. We show that this measurement error is considerable and has substantive consequences when using a measure of democracy as an independent variable in cross‐national statistical analyses. Our analysis suggests that skepticism as to the precision of the Polity democracy scale is well founded and that many researchers have been overly sanguine about the properties of the Polity democracy scale in applied statistical work.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00308.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The State Democracy Index models democracy as a latent variable.

    “For the main State Democracy Index measure, I model democracy as a latent variable (Treier and Jackman 2008).”

    From Laboratories of Democratic Backsliding (2023) · cites this paper as Treier and Jackman 2008

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Treier, S., & Jackman, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
Venue
American Journal of Political Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-01
Volume
52
Issue
1
Pages
201-217
ISSN
  • 0092-5853 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-5907
OpenAlex
W2161923163
Cited by
680
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 69 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 36
FWCI
47.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Political Science (publishedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
Keywords
democracy measurement, latent variable models, measurement error, scale reliability, cross-country analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review