Democracy as a Latent Variable
Abstract
We apply formal, statistical measurement models to the Polity indicators, used widely in studies of international relations to measure democracy. In so doing, we make explicit the hitherto implicit assumptions underlying scales built using the Polity indicators. Modeling democracy as a latent variable allows us to assess the “noise” (measurement error) in the resulting measure. We show that this measurement error is considerable and has substantive consequences when using a measure of democracy as an independent variable in cross‐national statistical analyses. Our analysis suggests that skepticism as to the precision of the Polity democracy scale is well founded and that many researchers have been overly sanguine about the properties of the Polity democracy scale in applied statistical work.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The State Democracy Index models democracy as a latent variable.
“For the main State Democracy Index measure, I model democracy as a latent variable (Treier and Jackman 2008).”
From Laboratories of Democratic Backsliding (2023) · cites this paper as Treier and Jackman 2008
Cites
Bernardo, J. M., & Smith, A. F. M. (1994) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9780470316870 · Cited by 2,178 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research: A Menu of Qualitative and Quantitative Options
Seawright, J., & Gerring, J. (2008) · Political Research Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1065912907313077 · Cited by 3,827 · see citing works
A Complete Data Set of Political Regimes, 1800–2007
Boix, C., Miller, M., & Rosato, S. (2013) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414012463905 · Cited by 1,072 · see citing works
Respect for Human Rights has Improved Over Time: Modeling the Changing Standard of Accountability
FARISS, C. J. (2014) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055414000070 · Cited by 706 · see citing works
Laboratories of Democratic Backsliding
GRUMBACH, J. M. (2023) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055422000934 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
“For the main State Democracy Index measure, I model democracy as a latent variable (Treier and Jackman 2008).”
BackgroundParties, Civil Society, and the Deterrence of Democratic Defection
Bernhard, M., Hicken, A., Reenock, C., & Lindberg, S. I. (2020) · Studies in Comparative International Development · doi:10.1007/s12116-019-09295-0 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Is There More Violence in the Middle?
Jones, Z. M., & Lupu, Y. (2018) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12373 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
- Authors
- Treier, S., & Jackman, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Stanford University (US)
- Venue
- American Journal of Political Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-01
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 201-217
- ISSN
- 0092-5853 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-5907
- OpenAlex
- W2161923163
- Cited by
- 680
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 69 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 36
- FWCI
- 47.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Political Science (publishedVersion)
- ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
- Keywords
- democracy measurement, latent variable models, measurement error, scale reliability, cross-country analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review