Cited by 706Political Conflict and GovernanceInternational Relations and Foreign PolicyHuman Rights and Development

Respect for Human Rights has Improved Over Time: Modeling the Changing Standard of Accountability

Open access
FARISS, CHRISTOPHER J.·2014·American Political Science Review

Abstract

According to indicators of political repression currently used by scholars, human rights practices have not improved over the past 35 years, despite the spread of human rights norms, better monitoring, and the increasing prevalence of electoral democracy. I argue that this empirical pattern is not an indication of stagnating human rights practices. Instead, it reflects a systematic change in the way monitors, like Amnesty International and the U.S. State Department, encounter and interpret information about abuses. The standard of accountability used to assess state behaviors becomes more stringent as monitors look harder for abuse, look in more places for abuse, and classify more acts as abuse. In this article, I present a new, theoretically informed measurement model, which generates unbiased estimates of repression using existing data. I then show that respect for human rights has improved over time and that the relationship between human rights respect and ratification of the UN Convention Against Torture is positive, which contradicts findings from existing research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0003055414000070

Cites

112 of 112 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The strategic belief is that critical infrastructure is more resilient when it is owned by the state, as state ownership reduces the risk of disruption of the most essential functions and ensures that these can be quickly restored.

    “The strategic belief is that critical infrastructure is more resilient when it is owned by the state, as state ownership reduces 'the risk of disruption of the most essential functions' and ensures that these can be quickly restored. 30”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
FARISS, C. J.
Affiliations
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Corresponding author
FARISS, CHRISTOPHER J.
Venue
American Political Science Review
Published
2014-05
Volume
108
Issue
2
Pages
297-318
ISSN
  • 0003-0554 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5943
OpenAlex
W2144960654
Cited by
706
References
112
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 62 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 77 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 123 · 2019: 73 · 2018: 61 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 1
FWCI
141.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Political Science Review (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Relations and Foreign Policy
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Human Rights and Development
Keywords
human rights, political repression, accountability standards, human rights monitoring, measurement bias, Amnesty International, United States Department of State, Convention against Torture, torture, measurement model, electoral democracy, human rights standards

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review