CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,369Policy Transfer and LearningElectoral Systems and Political ParticipationInnovation Diffusion and Forecasting

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Mechanisms of Policy Diffusion

Shipan, Charles R., Volden, Craig·2008·American Journal of Political Science
DOI 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00346.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Local policy adoptions provide an excellent opportunity to test among potential mechanisms of policy diffusion. By examining three types of antismoking policy choices by the 675 largest U.S. cities between 1975 and 2000, we uncover robust patterns of policy diffusion, yielding three key findings. First, we distinguish among and find evidence for four mechanisms of policy diffusion: learning from earlier adopters, economic competition among proximate cities, imitation of larger cities, and coercion by state governments. Second, we find a temporal component to these effects, with imitation being a more short‐lived diffusion process than the others. Third, we show that these mechanisms are conditional, with larger cities being better able to learn from others, less fearful of economic spillovers, and less likely to rely on imitation .

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00346.x

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 63 references

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Brandeis Louis Dembitz, 1932, Dissenting Opinion, New State Ice Co. v. Liebmann
  2. Chriqui Jamie F., 2000, Restricting Minors' Access to Tobacco Products: An Examination of State Legislation and Policy Innovation
  3. 10.1001/jama.273.10.805 · DOI
  4. 10.2307/2575080 · DOI
  5. Peterson Paul E., 1990, Welfare Magnets: A New Case for a National Standard
  6. Purlee Scott, 1995, Driving Influences: Operators Now Use Travel Time to Tally Potential Customers, Restaurants and Institutions, 105, 33
  7. 10.1002/j.2325-8012.2004.tb00605.x · DOI
  8. Tanyeri Dana, 2007, So Who Is Your Customer Anyway?, Restaurant Business, 106, 26
  9. 10.2307/1954434 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 701–800 of 1,000

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Shipan, C. R., & Volden, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • The Ohio State University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Shipan, Charles R.
  • Volden, Craig
ORCID
Venue
American Journal of Political Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-09-29
Volume
52
Issue
4
Pages
840-857
ISSN
  • 0092-5853 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-5907
DOI
10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00346.x
OpenAlex
W1986486185
Cited by
1,369
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 133 · 2025: 114 · 2024: 103 · 2023: 104 · 2022: 94 · 2021: 130 · 2020: 94 · 2019: 96 · 2018: 69 · 2017: 68 · 2016: 75 · 2015: 81 · 2014: 57 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 40
FWCI
142.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
Locations
American Journal of Political Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policy Transfer and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting
Keywords
policy diffusion, anti-smoking policy, smoking bans, cities, market competition, imitation, state coercion, city size, diffusion mechanism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review