The DOI matches its Crossref record; 71 of the 71 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How to Analyze Political Attention with Minimal Assumptions and Costs
Open accessAbstract
Previous methods of analyzing the substance of political attention have had to make several restrictive assumptions or been prohibitively costly when applied to large‐scale political texts. Here, we describe a topic model for legislative speech, a statistical learning model that uses word choices to infer topical categories covered in a set of speeches and to identify the topic of specific speeches. Our method estimates, rather than assumes, the substance of topics, the keywords that identify topics, and the hierarchical nesting of topics. We use the topic model to examine the agenda in the U.S. Senate from 1997 to 2004. Using a new database of over 118,000 speeches (70,000,000 words) from the Congressional Record, our model reveals speech topic categories that are both distinctive and meaningfully interrelated and a richer view of democratic agenda dynamics than had previously been possible.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Political scientists have extended topic models so that the parameters correspond to politically relevant quantities of interest.”
From Text as Data: The Promise and Pitfalls of Automatic Content Analysis Methods for Political Texts (2013) · cites this paper as Quinn et al. 2010
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Quinn et al. (2010) argue that if topics are valid, then external events should explain sudden increases in attention to a topic”
From Text as Data: The Promise and Pitfalls of Automatic Content Analysis Methods for Political Texts (2013) · cites this paper as Quinn et al. 2010
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“As Quinn et al. (2010) observe, unsupervised methods shift the user burden from determining categories before analysis to validating model output afterward.”
From Text as Data: The Promise and Pitfalls of Automatic Content Analysis Methods for Political Texts (2013) · cites this paper as Quinn et al. 2010
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The first topic model in political science is the dynamic multitopic model (Quinn et al. 2010), used to model the daily attention to topics in Senate floor speeches”
From Text as Data: The Promise and Pitfalls of Automatic Content Analysis Methods for Political Texts (2013) · cites this paper as Quinn et al. 2010
In the citing paper
“In contrast to computer scientists, who focus primarily on out-ofsample prediction, quantitative social scientists typically test their assumptions by assessing construct reliability and construct validity.”
From Measurement and Fairness (2021) · cites this paper as [49]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2003) · Journal of Machine Learning Research · doi:10.5555/944919.944937 · Cited by 32,337
Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology.
Shelley, M., & Krippendorff, K. (1984) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2288384 · Cited by 24,346
Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology
Krippendorff, K. (2019) · doi:10.4135/9781071878781 · Cited by 15,448
Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies
Perry, J. L., & Kingdon, J. W. (1985) · Journal of Policy Analysis and Management · doi:10.2307/3323801 · Cited by 11,238
Agendas, alternatives, and public policies
Kingdon, J. W. (1984) · Cited by 9,299
An algorithm for suffix stripping
Porter, M. F. (1980) · Program · doi:10.1108/eb046814 · Cited by 8,096
Weber, R. (1990) · doi:10.4135/9781412983488 · Cited by 7,750
Agendas and instability in American politics
(1993) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.31-0574 · Cited by 5,943
Congress, The Electoral Connection
Ross, M. J., & Mayhew, D. R. (1975) · The Western Political Quarterly · doi:10.2307/447379 · Cited by 4,094
Congress: The Electoral Connection, by David R. Mayhew
Page, B. I. (1975) · Political Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2148248 · Cited by 3,141
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Baumgartner Frank R., 2002, Policy Dynamics
- Katznelson Ira, 2006, The Macropolitics of Congress, 96
- 10.1017/S0020818303573064 · DOI
- Rohde David, 1985, Studies of Congress, 147
- Stone Philip J., 1966, The General Enquirer: A Computer Approach to Content Analysis
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–671 of 671
Calvo‐González, O., Larrinaga, A. E., & Reyes, G. (2018) · World Bank, Washington, DC eBooks · doi:10.1596/1813-9450-8311
Velhas questões, novos métodos: posições, agenda, ideologia e dinheiro na política brasileira
Izumi, M. (2018) · Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations (Universidade de São Paulo) · doi:10.11606/t.8.2018.tde-11042018-114905
Digital Words: Moving Forward with Measuring the Readability of Online Texts
Redmiles, E. M., Maszkiewicz, L., Hwang, E., Kuchhal, D., Liu, E., Morales, M., Peskov, D., Rao, S., Stevens, R., Gligorić, K., et al. (2018) · University Libraries (University of Maryland) · doi:10.13016/m2b853n3m
Issue Salience and Lawmaking: How Public Attention Drives Lawmaker Behavior
Zamadics, J. (2019) · CU Scholar (University of Colorado Boulder)
Debating Debate: Measuring Discursive Overlap on the Congressional Floor
Shoub, K. (2019) · Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) · doi:10.17615/129y-wq18
Who, what and when: how media and politicians shape the Brazilian debate on foreign affairs
Hardt, M. S. (2019) · Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations (Universidade de São Paulo) · doi:10.11606/t.101.2019.tde-09092019-155840
Surviving Nixon: The Politicization of Domestic and Foreign Policy, 1969-1974
Manson, A. H. (2019) · eScholarship (California Digital Library)
Homesickness, recollections and reunions
Moreton, E., & Culy, C. (2019) · Advances in historical sociolinguistics · doi:10.1075/ahs.10.05mor
Essays on central bank transparency, accountability and reputation
Lisi, G. (2020) · London School of Economics and Political Science Theses Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)
Ovádek, M., Lampach, N., & Dyèvre, A. (2019) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3393734
Quinn, K. M. (2021) · Journal of Law and Courts · doi:10.1086/715210
Self-citationMedia Framing of Contraception
Sherman, H. (2020) · Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) · doi:10.17615/q99q-7h88
Constitutional Dialects: The Language of Transnational Legal Orders
Law, D. S. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks
Schwartz, F. P. (2021) · Editora Metrics eBooks · doi:10.46550/978-65-89700-34-0.587-588
Exploring Polygenic Contributors to Subgroups of Comorbid Conditions in Atism Spectrum DisorderPreprint
Klein, L. A., D’Urso, S., Eapen, V., Hwang, L., & Lin, P. (2021) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-864669/v1
Sabharwal, R., & Miah, S. J. (2022) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1090813/v1
Marenco, M., & Seidl, T. (2020) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/6ex7t
The Information Value of Unstructured Analyst Opinions
Eickhoff, M. (2017) · eDiss (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen) · doi:10.53846/goediss-6389
TPPI: Textual Political Polarity Indices. The Case of Italian GDP
Amendola, A., Distaso, W., & Grimaldi, A. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-99638-3_2
Manger, M. S., & Kemertas, M. (2019) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3941145
Part(y) of Speech: Partisan Divides in Stylistic FramingPreprint
McMahon, R. (2018) · SocArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/dg5nx
Power, Resistance, and Slavery in the United StatesPreprint
Light, R., & Roscigno, V. J. (2020) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/wx26a
LINGUOSTYLISTIC PECULIARITIES OF D. TRUMP’S PRE-ELECTION POLITICAL RETHORIC
(2020) · PNRPU Linguistics and Pedagogy Bulletin · doi:10.15593/2224-9389/2020.1.6
Ask the Data: A Machine Learning Analysis of the Legal Scholarship on Artificial Intelligence
Zarra, A. (2022) · Information technology and law series/Information technology & law series · doi:10.1007/978-94-6265-523-2_23
Construction of Japanese Imperial Diet Database Using Deep Neural Network
Nonaka, N., & Nonaka, N. (2022) · Journal of Information Processing · doi:10.2197/ipsjjip.30.411
Deliberation as Words, Arguments, and Themes
Schonhardt-Bailey, C. (2022) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192847874.003.0002
Measurement error and model instability in automated text analysis: the case of topic modelsPreprint
Ralund, S., Carlsen, H. B., Klemmensen, R., & Lassen, D. D. (2022) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/rxtbg
A topikmodellezés lehetőségei és korlátai egy törvénykorpusz példáján
Gelányi, P., Sebők, M., & Ring, O. (2022) · Statisztikai Szemle · doi:10.20311/stat2022.8.hu0783
(2022) · International Journal of Business · doi:10.55802/ijb.027(3).004
Analysis on the Type of and Interest in Home Training Video Contents Using the YouTube Platform
Yun, H.-J., Park, J.-H., & Jeon, M. (2023) · Korean Journal of Sport Science · doi:10.24985/kjss.2023.34.1.13
Essays on the Economics of Law and Crime
Porreca, Z. J. (2023) · doi:10.33915/etd.12004
Birkenmaier, L., Lechner, C. M., & Wagner, C. (2023) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/kgn6f
Sturm, S. (2021) · Edition HWWI · doi:10.15460/hup.254.1927
How Presidents Answer the Call of International Capital
Arnold, C., Doyle, D. A., & Wiesehomeier, N. (2023) · Journal of Politics in Latin America · doi:10.1177/1866802x231210581
Rubin, R. B., Elinson, G., & TerBeek, C. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780192868282.013.27
Analyzing Collective Intelligence Through Sentiment Networks in Self-organized Douban Communities
Xie, T., & Wu, X.-K. (2024) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-981-99-9637-7_4
Intersectional Representation: Theory and Practice
Akirav, O. (2024) · Comparative studies of political agendas · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-53250-4_2
Transforming Modern Business with Digital Platforms - Exploring Solutions with Topic Modelling
Gupta, A. K., Saha, B., & Kaur, I. (2024) · International Conference on Computers in Management and Business (ICCMB) · doi:10.1145/3647782.3647798
Media Political Leanings: Polarised Depictions of Hong Kong Migration in Taiwan
Yau, C. W.-K. (2024) · Palgrave Macmillan studies on human rights in Asia · doi:10.1007/978-981-97-2867-1_7
Batz, A., Hinestroza, M. P. G., Cárdenas, L. F. S., D’Croz-Baron, D. F., & Ojeda-Sanchez, C. A. (2024) · IEEE Colombian Conference on Applications of Computational Intelligence (ColCACI) · doi:10.1109/colcaci63187.2024.10666530
Automatic Keyword Extraction from German Journalistic Discourse Using Statistical Methods
Khokhlova, M. V., & Витальевич, К. М. (2024) · Springer geography · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-67762-5_6
Legislation For Sale? The Influence of PhRMA Campaign Donations on US House Health LegislationPreprint
Flaxman, B. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5018393
(2025) · Discussions · doi:10.28953/2997-2582.1205
Political Debate about Economic Issues: Some Insights from the Polish Parliament, 1991–2019
Fałkowski, J., Lewkowicz, J., & Nawaro, Ł. (2025) · Ekonomista · doi:10.52335/ekon/200084
Greene, Z., Cerón, A., Schumacher, G., & Fazekas, Z. (2016) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/ghxj8_v1
Batz, A., Hinestroza, M. P. G., Cárdenas, L. F. S., D’Croz-Baron, D. F., & Sánchez, C. A. O. (2025) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-88854-0_7
Corpus-Based Exploration of Defense-Related Political Speeches
Ivanović, M., & Kocijan, K. (2025) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-89810-5_8
Detecting Formatted Text: Data Collection Using Computer Vision
Colner, J. (2025) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1017/pan.2025.10006
Divergence or Dysfunction? Using LLMs to Measure Disagreement on the U.S. Supreme Court
Rice, D. R., & Zorn, C. (2025) · Journal of Political Institutions and Political Economy · doi:10.1561/113.00000127
Özbay, O., Burmaoğlu, S., & Taymaz, E. (2025) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-025-05464-2
Measuring lexical distance between parallel corpora: the case of AI-generated news translation
Conway, K., Gramaccia, J. A., Scholz, N., & Averbeck, T. (2025) · Perspectives · doi:10.1080/0907676x.2025.2590066
Park, J. (2025) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-26629-4.00222-7
Opinion Mining e integrated Sentiment Analysis (iSA)
Cerón, A., Curini, L., & Iacus, S. M. (2014) · SxI Springer per l'Innovazione · doi:10.1007/978-88-470-5532-2_2
Mestre, R., & Ryan, M. (2026) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1017/pan.2025.10031
Commerce and Campaigns: The Local Roots of Globalization Messaging in US Presidential SpeechesPreprint
Flaherty, T., Trinh, D., Kim, C., & Hundley, O. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5599992
Rizgelienė, I., Marcinkevičius, V., & Plikynas, D. (2026) · EPJ Data Science · doi:10.1140/epjds/s13688-026-00648-z
Gauthier, G. (2023) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/950f4696z6651z4992z895az1f9ded1c545b
Pattnaik, S., Jain, C., & Pinsky, E. (2026) · Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction · doi:10.3390/make8040098 · Cited by 1
What Are They Talking About? Classifying Texts into Policy Domains
Lehmann, P. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-11081-7_6
How to Measure Them? Selecting the Method
Lehmann, P. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-11081-7_5
Parliamentary power in early representative assemblies: evidence from XVII century England
Rodón, T., & Paskhalis, T. (2026) · Journal of Historical Political Economy · doi:10.1108/jhpe-09-2025-0021
Bukhari, M. J. S., Shah, S. A. H., Malavolta, M., Tsipourakis, A., Shah, S. B. H., Panagiotopoulos, K., Shah, S. T. H., & Deriu, M. A. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-9936828/v1
Prompt-Based LLM Analysis of Policy Agenda Evolution in U.S. Presidential Debates (1960-2024)
Prahallad, L., & Mamidi, R. (2026) · International Conference on Federated Learning and Intelligent Computing Systems (FLICS) · doi:10.1109/flics70075.2026.11621938
Assembling Topic Models: Material Political Economy and the Genealogy of an Algorithm
Zhang, B. (2026) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/03063127261469570
손흥민의 LAFC 이적에 나타난 한⋅미 팬덤의 반응 비교: 유튜브 댓글을 중심으로
송, 정., & 황, 동. (2026) · 한국체육학회지 · doi:10.23949/kjpe.2026.7.65.4.20
Active Learning and Education 4.0: Insights from an International Relations Simulation
Lacerda, J. M. D. A. F., & Sposito, Í. B. (2026) · Journal of Political Science Education · doi:10.1080/15512169.2026.2740814
Kim, M. H., & Kim, K. (2026) · Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics · doi:10.1093/9780197851821.003.2315
Party Messaging Participation in the U.S. House of Representatives
Koger, G., & Hughes, T. (2026) · Congress & the Presidency · doi:10.1080/07343469.2026.2726759
Metadata
- Authors
- Quinn, K. M., Monroe, B. L., Colaresi, M., Crespin, M. H., & Radev, D. R.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Pennsylvania State University (US)
- Michigan State University (US)
- University of Georgia (US)
- University of Michigan (US)
- Venue
- American Journal of Political Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-12-28
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 209-228
- ISSN
- 0092-5853 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-5907
- OpenAlex
- W2144874182
- Cited by
- 671
- References
- 70
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 64 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 52 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 72.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- public-domain
- onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
- Locations
- American Journal of Political Science (publishedVersion, public-domain)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (0527513, 0714688)
- Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University
- Center for Advanced Study, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
- Topics
- Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Computational and Text Analysis Methods
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
- Keywords
- political attention, parliamentary speeches, topic modeling, topic hierarchy, United States Senate, congressional records, statistical learning, word choice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
