The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Global Measures of Information Service Quality: A Cross‐National Study*
Abstract
Maintaining consistently high quality information services (IS) is a powerful means of increasing the overall efficiency and effectiveness of a global enterprise. This study introduces a global Information Services Function (ISF) Quality Framework that outlines the importance of both behavioral and procedural dimensions in planning, implementing and evaluating global IS quality. Based on this framework, the study investigates the cross‐national psychometric properties of a behavioral measure of service quality in the IS context. Using a cross‐national survey of IS customers from Korea, Hong Kong, the United States and the Netherlands, perceived ISF service quality was measured using a service quality measure (SERVQUAL) to determine cultural affects. Based on confirmatory factor analysis, support was found for four of the original five SERVQUAL quality dimensions in the U.S.A. and the Netherlands. However, the same four‐dimensional measurement model did not fit the Hong Kong and Korean samples. Further factor analysis showed that the Hong Kong and Korean samples shared a somewhat similar factor structure that differs from the shared U.S.A. and Netherlands structure. These findings support previous research that has found an “Asian factor'’with differing definitions of IS Service quality. These findings suggest that the feasibility of standardized global ISF measurement depends heavily on the relative magnitude of cultural effects. Rather than merely applying the U.S.A. ISF/SERVQUAL measure, a localized version of the instrument may need to be developed that captures the unique nature of ISF service perceptions in internationally based subsidiaries or companies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SERVQUAL: A multiple-Item Scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality
Parasuraman, A., Berry, L. L., & Zeithaml, V. A. (1988) · Zenodo · doi:10.5281/zenodo.14579729 · Cited by 21,118
Representing and Testing Organizational Theories: A Holistic Construal
Bagozzi, R. P., & Phillips, L. W. (1982) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392322 · Cited by 2,064
Cited by
Customer Loyalty in E-Commerce
Drexel University, & Gefen, D. (2002) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00022 · Cited by 1,062
NELSON, R. R., TODD, P. A., & WIXOM, B. H. (2005) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2005.11045823 · Cited by 998
Malhotra, N. K., Ulgado, F. M., Agarwal, J., Shainesh, G., & Wu, L. (2005) · International Marketing Review · doi:10.1108/02651330510602204 · Cited by 319
Measuring Information Systems Service Quality: Lessons From Two Longitudinal Case Studies1
Watson, R. T., Pitt, L. F., & Kavan, C. B. (1998) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249678 · Cited by 276
Boyer, K. K., & Hult, G. T. M. (2006) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2005.04.002 · Cited by 158
Metadata
- Authors
- Kettinger, W. J., Lee, C. C., & Lee, S.
- Venue
- Decision Sciences
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-09
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 569-588
- ISSN
- 0011-7315 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-5915
- OpenAlex
- W1971234500
- Cited by
- 242
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Global Measures of Information Service Quality: A Cross‐National Study*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1995.tb01441.x
- The paper
- Kettinger, W. J., Lee, C. C., & Lee, S. (1995). Global Measures of Information Service Quality: A Cross‐National Study*. Decision Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1995.tb01441.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.