The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measuring Information Systems Service Quality: Lessons From Two Longitudinal Case Studies1
Abstract
IS service quality was measured three times in an information management consulting firm and an information service business. After the first measurement, IS management initiated several actions to improve service quality. The second measurement indicated that service quality improved in the intervening period. When service quality was measured a third time, it had returned to the levels of the first measurement. The evidence suggests that management’s attention to service quality waned after about a year, and IS management needs to recognize that service quality is not a fad but an ongoing commitment. The paper concludes by recognizing that delivering IS service quality requires action at three levels (strategic, tactical, and operational) and that the CIO must pay continuing attention to IS service quality. A model for building service quality into IS is described.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SERVQUAL: A multiple-Item Scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality
Parasuraman, A., Berry, L. L., & Zeithaml, V. A. (1988) · Zenodo · doi:10.5281/zenodo.14579729 · Cited by 21,118
Cited by
Antecedents of B2C Channel Satisfaction and Preference: Validating e-Commerce Metrics
Devaraj, S., Fan, M., & Kohli, R. (2002) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.13.3.316.77 · Cited by 1,205
Customer Loyalty in E-Commerce
Drexel University, & Gefen, D. (2002) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00022 · Cited by 1,062
Organizational impact of system quality, information quality, and service quality
Gorla, N., Somers, T. M., & Wong, B. (2010) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2010.05.001 · Cited by 965
An empirical study on predicting user acceptance of e-shopping on the Web
Shih, H.-P. (2004) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-7206(03)00079-x · Cited by 722
A trust model for online peer-to-peer lending: a lender’s perspective
Chen, D., Lai, F., & Lin, Z. (2014) · Information Technology and Management · doi:10.1007/s10799-014-0187-z · Cited by 208
Metadata
- Authors
- Watson, R. T., Pitt, L. F., & Kavan, C. B.
- Venue
- MIS Quarterly
- Publisher
- MIS Quarterly
- Published
- 1998-03-01
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 61-79
- ISSN
- 0276-7783 (ISSN-L)
- 2162-9730
- OpenAlex
- W1492017688
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measuring Information Systems Service Quality: Lessons From Two Longitudinal Case Studies1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/249678
- The paper
- Watson, R. T., Pitt, L. F., & Kavan, C. B. (1998). Measuring Information Systems Service Quality: Lessons From Two Longitudinal Case Studies1. MIS Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.2307/249678
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
