The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Path Analytic Model of a Theory of Quality Management Underlying the Deming Management Method: Preliminary Empirical Findings*
Abstract
Despite the impact that Deming and his 14 Points have had on the practice of quality management, empirical support for the effectiveness of the Deming Management Method has not advanced beyond the presentation of anecdotal, case‐study evidence. In part, this is because theory to guide the conduct of empirical research has not been available. Only recently has such a theory of quality management to describe and explain the effectiveness of the Deming Management Method been articulated in the literature. This paper continues the journey of theory development; it reports the results of an exploratory empirical analysis of an articulated theory of quality management underlying the Deming Management Method. The constructs in the proposed theory are operationalized using measurement statements developed by the World‐Class Manufacturing research project team at the University of Minnesota and Iowa State University. Path analysis is applied to the World‐Class Manufacturing project data to explore the empirical strength of relationships advanced in the theory. The path analytic results provide support for several of the proposed relationships in the theory, and more importantly, suggest a number of new relationships which have not heretofore been proposed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests
Cronbach, L. J. (1951) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02310555 · Cited by 43,931
Cited by
The relationship between total quality management practices and their effects on firm performance
Kaynak, H. (2003) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/s0272-6963(03)00004-4 · Cited by 1,893
Peng, D. X., & Lai, F. (2012) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2012.06.002 · Cited by 1,532
KANNAN, V (2005) · Omega · doi:10.1016/j.omega.2004.03.012 · Cited by 720
Sadikoglu, E., & Zehir, C. (2010) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.02.013 · Cited by 600
Nair, A. (2006) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2005.11.005 · Cited by 593
Metadata
- Authors
- Anderson, J. C., Rungtusanatham, M., Schroeder, R. G., & Devaraj, S.
- Venue
- Decision Sciences
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-09
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 637-658
- ISSN
- 0011-7315 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-5915
- OpenAlex
- W2080990131
- Cited by
- 500
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Path Analytic Model of a Theory of Quality Management Underlying the Deming Management Method: Preliminary Empirical Findings*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1995.tb01444.x
- The paper
- Anderson, J. C., Rungtusanatham, M., Schroeder, R. G., & Devaraj, S. (1995). A Path Analytic Model of a Theory of Quality Management Underlying the Deming Management Method: Preliminary Empirical Findings*. Decision Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1995.tb01444.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.