Dynamic gravity: endogenous country size and asset accumulation
Abstract
Abstract Numerous gravity applications have resorted to panel data econometric techniques over the past decade. However, with the theory of gravity being so far only static, these estimations lack solid structural dynamic foundations. As a consequence, a consensus on a unified dynamic gravity estimation approach is yet to be reached. In this paper, (i) we build the theoretical foundations for a dynamic gravity model, (ii) we provide guidance for gravity‐type estimations with panel data and we consider applications, and (iii) we calibrate and simulate our model to compare its properties with those of the standard, static gravity setup.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Olivero and Yotov (2012) experiment with 3-, 4- and 5-year intervals.
“For example, Baier and Bergstrand (2007) use five-year intervals, while Olivero and Yotov (2012) experiment with 3-, 4-and 5-year intervals.”
From Estimating the effects of trade agreements: Lessons from 60 years of methods and data (2024) · cites this paper as Olivero and Yotov (2012)
Cites
Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models
Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/s0304-4076(98)00009-8 · Cited by 22,571 · see citing works
Estimating Trade Flows: Trading Partners and Trading Volumes <sup>*</sup>
Helpman, E., Melitz, M., & Rubinstein, Y. (2008) · Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/qjec.2008.123.2.441 · Cited by 2,436 · see citing works
The Long and Short of the Canada-U.S. Free Trade Agreement
Trefler, D. (2004) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/0002828042002633 · Cited by 1,071 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Estimating the effects of trade agreements: Lessons from 60 years of methods and data
Larch, M., & Yotov, Y. V. (2024) · The World Economy · doi:10.1111/twec.13569 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Olivero, M. P., & Yotov, Y. V.
- Affiliations
- Drexel University (US)
- ORCID
- Yotov, Yoto V.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-02
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 64-92
- ISSN
- 0008-4085 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-5982
- OpenAlex
- W2154626811
- Cited by
- 341
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 28 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 20.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Global trade and economics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Growth and Productivity
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Spatial and Panel Data Analysis
- Keywords
- dynamic gravity model, asset accumulation, trade theory, panel data estimation, model calibration, model simulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review