The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Challenging Business of Long‐Term Public–Private Partnerships: Reflections on Local Experience
Abstract
Many widely publicized arrangements bearing the popular “public–private partnership” label are complex, long‐term contracts between municipalities and private companies. In theory, these innovative contracts offer substantial public benefits, including improved service quality, risk sharing with the private sector, and cost savings. In practice, however, the challenges that long‐term contracts pose can undermine their successful implementation at the local level. Drawing on illustrative cases, this article explores some practical impediments to achieving market‐driven competition, equitable risk sharing, effective performance guarantees, and appropriate transparency in innovative long‐term contracts. It examines the inapplicability of the partnership model to most commercial transactions between government and business, the risks of uncontrollable circumstances, the impact of local resource constraints, and barriers to transparency in long‐term contracts. It concludes that local governments embarking on long‐term contracts must invest in specialized expertise, effective contract management, and strong governance structures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Privatization and public-private partnerships
(2000) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.37-5792 · Cited by 1,145
Vigoda, E. (2002) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/1540-6210.00235 · Cited by 826
Coming to Terms With the Public-Private Partnership: A Grammar of Multiple Meanings
Linder, S. H. (1999) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/00027649921955146 · Cited by 436
The Rhetoric and Reality of Public-Private Partnerships
Wettenhall, R. (2003) · Public Organization Review · doi:10.1023/a:1023000128175 · Cited by 333
Partnership Arrangements: Governmental Rhetoric or Governance Scheme?
Teisman, G. R., & Klijn, E. (2002) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/0033-3352.00170 · Cited by 306
Rosenau, P. V. (1999) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/0002764299043001002 · Cited by 118
Public-private partnerships: the Australasian experience with physical infrastructure
Hodge, G. A. (2005) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.4337/9781845428082.00021 · Cited by 45
Cited by
An Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance
Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/mur011 · Cited by 3,637
A review of emerging trends in global PPP research: analysis and visualization
Song, J., Zhang, H., & Dong, W. (2016) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-016-1918-1 · Cited by 323
Characterising the concept of service experience
Helkkula, A. (2011) · Journal of Service Management · doi:10.1108/09564231111136872 · Cited by 295
Metadata
- Authors
- Bloomfield, P.
- Venue
- Public Administration Review
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-05
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 400-411
- ISSN
- 0033-3352 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-6210
- OpenAlex
- W2002792770
- Cited by
- 318
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 22.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Challenging Business of Long‐Term Public–Private Partnerships: Reflections on Local Experience. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00597.x
- The paper
- Bloomfield, P. (2006). The Challenging Business of Long‐Term Public–Private Partnerships: Reflections on Local Experience. Public Administration Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00597.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.