The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
From Responsiveness to Collaboration: Governance, Citizens, and the Next Generation of Public Administration
Abstract
The evolution of the New Public Management movement has increased pressure on state bureaucracies to become more responsive to citizens as clients. Without a doubt, this is an important advance in contemporary public administration, which finds itself struggling in an ultradynamic marketplace. However, together with such a welcome change in theory building and in practical culture reconstruction, modern societies still confront a growth in citizens’ passivism; they tend to favor the easy chair of the customer over the sweat and turmoil of participatory involvement. This article has two primary goals: First to establish a theoretically and empirically grounded criticism of the current state of new managerialism, which obscures the significance of citizen action and participation through overstressing the (important) idea of responsiveness. Second, the article proposes some guidelines for the future development of the discipline. This progress is toward enhanced collaboration and partnership among governance and public administration agencies, citizens, and other social players such as the media, academia, and the private and third sectors. The article concludes that, despite the fact that citizens are formal “owners” of the state, ownership will remain a symbolic banner for the governance and public administration–citizen relationship in a representative democracy. The alternative interaction of movement between responsiveness and collaboration is more realistic for the years ahead.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Participation and Democratic Theory
Pateman, C. (1970) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511720444 · Cited by 6,159
Cited by
Collaboration and Leadership for Effective Emergency Management
Waugh, W. L., & Streib, G. (2006) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00673.x · Cited by 1,119
Enhancing Collaborative Innovation in the Public Sector
Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2011) · Administration & Society · doi:10.1177/0095399711418768 · Cited by 931
Martin, G. P. (2008) · Sociology of Health & Illness · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9566.2007.01027.x · Cited by 356
The Challenging Business of Long‐Term Public–Private Partnerships: Reflections on Local Experience
Bloomfield, P. (2006) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00597.x · Cited by 318
Wakefield, S. E. L., & Poland, B. (2005) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.11.012 · Cited by 276
Metadata
- Authors
- Vigoda, E.
- Venue
- Public Administration Review
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-01
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 527-540
- ISSN
- 0033-3352 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-6210
- OpenAlex
- W2131597270
- Cited by
- 826
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 38.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: From Responsiveness to Collaboration: Governance, Citizens, and the Next Generation of Public Administration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1540-6210.00235
- The paper
- Vigoda, E. (2002). From Responsiveness to Collaboration: Governance, Citizens, and the Next Generation of Public Administration. Public Administration Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6210.00235
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.