The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Overcoming the Barriers to Cooperation: Intergovernmental Service Agreements
Abstract
Interlocal cooperation through service-sharing agreements has a long history, but its use has increased in popularity during the last 20 years. The decisions of local government units to collaborate through intergovernmental service agreements are best understood as a two-stage process. The first stage, in which communities decide whether to consider interlocal cooperation, involves the nature of the immediate problem faced plus specific demands for performance and efficiency gains that can result from service cooperation. In the second stage, communities confront a question of institutional supply, and hence must overcome inherent bargaining and collective action issues in order to forge interlocal agreements. Heckman probit estimates of such complex relationships using data drawn from a 2003 ICMA survey suggest strong support for this model. The authors conclude by discussing the role of network relationships among local actors for reducing transaction costs and facilitating intergovernmental collaboration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Institutional Collective Action Framework
Feiock, R. C. (2013) · Policy Studies Journal · doi:10.1111/psj.12023 · Cited by 691
Self-citationGil-Garcia, J. R., Pardo, T. A., & Nam, T. (2015) · Information Polity · doi:10.3233/ip-150354 · Cited by 493
Metadata
- Authors
- Kwon, S.-W., & Feiock, R. C.
- Venue
- Public Administration Review
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-10-26
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 876-884
- ISSN
- 0033-3352 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2046251444
- Cited by
- 203
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Overcoming the Barriers to Cooperation: Intergovernmental Service Agreements. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02219.x
- The paper
- Kwon, S.-W., & Feiock, R. C. (2010). Overcoming the Barriers to Cooperation: Intergovernmental Service Agreements. Public Administration Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02219.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.