The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reflections on Street‐Level Bureaucracy: Past, Present, and Future
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sandfort, J. R. (2000) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024289 · Cited by 320
Cited by
Camillo, C. A. (2017) · Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_654-1 · Cited by 685
Camillo, C. A. (2018) · Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-20928-9_654 · Cited by 474
Complaint-Oriented Policing: Regulating Homelessness in Public Space
Herring, C. (2019) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/0003122419872671 · Cited by 275
Digital discretion: A systematic literature review of ICT and street-level discretion
Busch, P. A., & Henriksen, H. Z. (2018) · Information Polity · doi:10.3233/ip-170050 · Cited by 267
Policy Feedback and the Politics of Administration
Moynihan, D. P., & Soss, J. (2014) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.12200 · Cited by 265
Metadata
- Authors
- Brodkin, E. Z.
- Venue
- Public Administration Review
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-09-18
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 940-949
- ISSN
- 0033-3352 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-6210
- OpenAlex
- W2138339354
- Cited by
- 453
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 27.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reflections on Street‐Level Bureaucracy: Past, Present, and Future. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02657.x
- The paper
- Brodkin, E. Z. (2012). Reflections on Street‐Level Bureaucracy: Past, Present, and Future. Public Administration Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02657.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.