The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Religion and Public Opinion about Same‐Sex Marriage*
Abstract
Objective.The goal of this article is to analyze the relationship between religion, measured in terms of religious affiliation and religiosity, and public opinion about same‐sex marriage, civil unions, and a federal constitutional amendment that would prohibit gay marriage. Methods.We use logistic regression with calculated standardized coefficients to analyze data from a nationally representative survey of 1,610 respondents conducted in March–April 2004. Results.Religious variables perform better than demographic measures in models of attitudes about same‐sex unions. Non‐Protestants are much more likely to support same‐sex unions than are Protestants, and individuals with conservative attitudes toward morality and secularism and (to a lesser extent) those who participate actively in religious life are more likely to oppose such unions. On the whole, religious variables play a weaker role in predicting support for a constitutional amendment to prevent gay marriage than they do in predicting attitudes toward same‐sex unions. Conclusions.Religious variables play powerful roles in structuring attitudes about same‐sex unions. Moreover, homosexuality appears to be a major component of the “moral values” discourse that is currently so popular in American politics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Applied Logistic Regression Analysis
Menard, S. (2002) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781412983433 · Cited by 2,989
The Measure of American Religion: Toward Improving the State of the Art
Steensland, B., Robinson, L. D., Wilcox, W. B., Park, J. Z., Regnerus, M., & Woodberry, R. D. (2000) · Social Forces · doi:10.1093/sf/79.1.291 · Cited by 1,823
Intimate matters: a history of sexuality in America
(1988) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.26-1209 · Cited by 940
Herek, G. M., & Capitanio, J. P. (1996) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167296224007 · Cited by 874
Sex Differences in Attitudes Toward Homosexual Persons, Behaviors, and Civil Rights A Meta-Analysis
Kite, M. E., & Whitley, B. E. (1996) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167296224002 · Cited by 835
The great divide : religious and cultural conflict in American party politics
Layman, G. C. (2001) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 736
Gender Gaps in Public Opinion about Lesbians and Gay Men
Herek, G. M. (2002) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1086/338409 · Cited by 683
America's Liberalization in Attitudes toward Homosexuality, 1973 TO 1998
Loftus, J. (2001) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/000312240106600507 · Cited by 679
Interpersonal contact and heterosexuals’ attitudes toward gay men: Results from a national survey
Herek, G. M., & Glunt, E. K. (1993) · Journal of Sex Research · doi:10.1080/00224499309551707 · Cited by 551
Beyond "Homophobia": A Social Psychological Perspective on Attitudes Toward Lesbians and Gay Men
Herek, G. M. (1984) · Journal of Homosexuality · doi:10.1300/j082v10n01_01 · Cited by 541
Cited by
Economic Inequality and Intolerance: Attitudes toward Homosexuality in 35 Democracies
Andersen, R., & Fetner, T. (2008) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00352.x · Cited by 371
Changing Same-Sex Marriage Attitudes in America from 1988 Through 2010
Baunach, D. M. (2012) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfs022 · Cited by 317
Religion, politics, and support for same-sex marriage in the United States, 1988–2008
Sherkat, D. E., Powell-Williams, M., Maddox, G., & de Vries, K. M. (2011) · Social Science Research · doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2010.08.009 · Cited by 268
Religion and Sexual Identity Fluidity in a National Three-Wave Panel of U.S. Adults
Scheitle, C. P., & Wolf, J. K. (2018) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10508-017-0979-4 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Olson, L. R., Cadge, W., & Harrison, J. T.
- Venue
- Social Science Quarterly
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-05-09
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 340-360
- ISSN
- 0038-4941 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-6237
- OpenAlex
- W1969086763
- Cited by
- 428
- References
- 32
- FWCI
- 9.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Religion and Public Opinion about Same‐Sex Marriage*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2006.00384.x
- The paper
- Olson, L. R., Cadge, W., & Harrison, J. T. (2006). Religion and Public Opinion about Same‐Sex Marriage*. Social Science Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2006.00384.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.