CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 7Chinese history and philosophyIndian and Buddhist StudiesTraditional Chinese Medicine Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

UNDERSTANDING DOUBLE MYSTERY: DAOISM IN EARLY TANG AS MIRRORED IN THE FDLH (T 2104) AND CHONGXUANXUE

ASSANDRI, FRIEDERIKE·2005·Journal of Chinese Philosophy
DOI 10.1111/j.1540-6253.2005.00202.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Journal of Chinese PhilosophyVolume 32, Issue 3 p. 427-440 UNDERSTANDING DOUBLE MYSTERY: DAOISM IN EARLY TANG AS MIRRORED IN THE FDLH (T 2104) AND CHONGXUANXUE FRIEDERIKE ASSANDRI, FRIEDERIKE ASSANDRI UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG Heidelberg, GermanySearch for more papers by this author FRIEDERIKE ASSANDRI, FRIEDERIKE ASSANDRI UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG Heidelberg, GermanySearch for more papers by this author First published: 11 August 2005 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6253.2005.00202.xCitations: 2 FRIEDERIKE ASSANDRI. Ph.D., research associate, University of Heidelberg. Specialties: history of medieval Daoism, Buddhism, interreligious debates in medieval China. E-mail: [email protected] Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat Citing Literature Volume32, Issue3September 2005Pages 427-440 RelatedInformation

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1540-6253.2005.00202.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Sunayama Minoru, 1980, Shukan Tuyugaku, 43, 31
  2. Yi Wan, 1998, Daojia Wenhua Yanjiu, 13, 267
  3. 1998, Daojiao Wenhua Yanjiu, 13, 197

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
ASSANDRI, F.
Affiliations
Heidelberg University (DE)
Corresponding author
ASSANDRI, FRIEDERIKE
ORCID
ASSANDRI, FRIEDERIKE
Venue
Journal of Chinese Philosophy
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Published
2005-09
Volume
32
Issue
3
Pages
427-440
ISSN
  • 0301-8121 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-6253
DOI
10.1111/j.1540-6253.2005.00202.x
OpenAlex
W2013780388
Cited by
7
References
0
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1 (tdm, 3652 d)
Locations
Journal of Chinese Philosophy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Chinese history and philosophy
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies
Keywords
Daoism, early Tang dynasty, Daoist cosmology, interreligious debate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review