The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Entrepreneurial Team Development in Academic Spinouts: An Examination of Team Heterogeneity
Abstract
This article examines the dynamics of entrepreneurial teams as they evolve through the different stages of a spin–out process. Using a unique, hand–collected set of data covering all team members in 10 cases, an in–depth analysis of the heterogeneity of team members’ experience and perception of the strategic orientation needed to attain different milestones in the spin–out process was performed. Our findings suggest that teams evolve over time and change in composition, and therefore, they cannot be studied as immutable entities. At the start of the venture formation, we introduced a new team role, the privileged witness, potentially specific for spinouts. Analysis of the teams indicates that the team's heterogeneity changes as it evolves through the different stages of the spin–out process. In particular, we found that new team members brought in different kinds of experience; however, they did not introduce a different view on doing business from the initial team members.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1984) · Cited by 81,983
(1994) · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · doi:10.1016/0002-8223(94)92216-0 · Cited by 45,910
Case Study Research: Design and Methods
Chaiklin, H. (1991) · The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/00005053-199102000-00025 · Cited by 39,535
Separation of Ownership and Control
Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983) · The Journal of Law and Economics · doi:10.1086/467037 · Cited by 19,058
Building Theories from Case Study Research
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258557 · Cited by 17,455
Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers
Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1984.4277628 · Cited by 10,220
On Studying Organizational Cultures
Pettigrew, A. M. (1979) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392363 · Cited by 2,498
A Process Model of Internal Corporate Venturing in the Diversified Major Firm
Burgelman, R. A. (1983) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392619 · Cited by 1,878
Criteria used by venture capitalists to evaluate new venture proposals
Macmillan, I. C., Siegel, R., & Narasimha, P. N. S. (1985) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/0883-9026(85)90011-4 · Cited by 1,130
Critical junctures in the development of university high-tech spinout companies
Vohora, A., Wright, M., & Lockett, A. (2004) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(03)00107-0 · Cited by 1,057
Self-citation
Cited by
Editor's Introduction. Entrepreneurs’ Behavior: Elucidation and Measurement
Bird, B., Schjoedt, L., & Baum, J. R. (2012) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00535.x · Cited by 138
Metadata
- Authors
- Vanaelst, I., Clarysse, B., Wright, M., Lockett, A., Moray, N., & S'Jegers, R.
- Venue
- Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2006-03
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 249-271
- ISSN
- 1042-2587 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-6520
- OpenAlex
- W1989024996
- Cited by
- 329
- References
- 32
- FWCI
- 20.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Entrepreneurial Team Development in Academic Spinouts: An Examination of Team Heterogeneity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00120.x
- The paper
- Vanaelst, I., Clarysse, B., Wright, M., Lockett, A., Moray, N., & S'Jegers, R. (2006). Entrepreneurial Team Development in Academic Spinouts: An Examination of Team Heterogeneity. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00120.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.