The DOI matches its Crossref record; 87 of the 87 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Entrepreneurship Research on Network Processes: A Review and Ways Forward
Abstract
Although entrepreneurship research on networks has studied issues pertaining to network content, governance and structure, we believe it requires a greater understanding of network processes. In this paper, we review how the entrepreneurship literature interprets and applies the concept of process to the study of networks. This allows us to identify areas for future investigation. Our work is also informed by social network theory and research on dyadic interactions in business networks. The paper concludes by presenting a theoretical framework for conceptualizing and studying the various processes associated with network development.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Granovetter, M. S. (1973) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/225469 · Cited by 40,491
Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness
Granovetter, M. (1985) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/228311 · Cited by 28,745
Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital
Coleman, J. S. (1988) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/228943 · Cited by 26,975
Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital
COLEMAN, J. (2000) · Knowledge and Social Capital · doi:10.1016/b978-0-7506-7222-1.50005-2 · Cited by 21,666
The Social Psychology of Organizations.
Hackman, J. R., Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1979) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2989929 · Cited by 12,235
(1993) · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · doi:10.1016/0002-8223(93)92196-5 · Cited by 11,976
(1969) · Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa) · Cited by 10,735
Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness
Uzzi, B. (1997) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393808 · Cited by 9,670
Burt, R. S. (1992) · doi:10.4159/9780674029095 · Cited by 9,093
Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology
Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393988 · Cited by 8,499
Cited by
Stam, W., Arzlanian, S., & Elfring, T. (2014) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.01.002 · Cited by 1,018
A critical review of entrepreneurial ecosystems research: towards a future research agenda
Alvedalen, J., & Boschma, R. (2017) · European Planning Studies · doi:10.1080/09654313.2017.1299694 · Cited by 755
Rawhouser, H., Cummings, M., & Newbert, S. L. (2019) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1177/1042258717727718 · Cited by 555
Clearing a Path Through the Forest: A Meta-Review of Interorganizational Relationships
Parmigiani, A., & Rivera-Santos, M. (2011) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206311407507 · Cited by 448
Adapting the Uppsala model to a modern world: Macro-context and microfoundations
Coviello, N., Kano, L., & Liesch, P. W. (2017) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/s41267-017-0120-x · Cited by 446
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Slotte–Kock, S., & Coviello, N.
- Venue
- Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2010-01
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 31-57
- ISSN
- 1042-2587 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-6520
- OpenAlex
- W2058869033
- Cited by
- 507
- References
- 87
- FWCI
- 35.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Entrepreneurship Research on Network Processes: A Review and Ways Forward. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00311.x
- The paper
- Slotte–Kock, S., & Coviello, N. (2010). Entrepreneurship Research on Network Processes: A Review and Ways Forward. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00311.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
