Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 448

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 102 of the 102 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Clearing a Path Through the Forest: A Meta-Review of Interorganizational Relationships

Parmigiani, Anne, Rivera-Santos, Miguel·2011·Journal of Management

Abstract

Interorganizational relationships (IORs) encompass a broad array of collaborative exchanges, including strategic alliances, joint ventures, buyer—supplier agreements, licensing, co-branding, franchising, cross-sector partnerships, networks, trade associations, and consortia. Scholarly work in this area typically focuses on particular forms, which has made it difficult to build a holistic understanding of why organizations engage in these relationships. This article summarizes the IOR literature by conducting a meta-review, a review of the reviews that have covered various IOR forms and theories. Through this approach, the authors highlight similarities and differences among forms and acknowledge perspectives grounded in organizational economics and organization theory. In line with March’s seminal framework, the authors identify two pure forms of IORs: co-exploration and co-exploitation. Explicating these pure forms enables the integration of different theories and the reconciliation of the empirical reality that IORs, like firms, combine exploration and exploitation. The authors conclude by suggesting directions for future work, highlighting areas rich in potential.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0149206311407507

Cites

102 of 102 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 102 references

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Ahern, K.R., 2007, Journal of Applied Finance, 17, 5
  2. 10.1177/014920630002600302 · doi:10.1177/014920630002600302
  3. 10.4135/9780857021007.n9 · doi:10.4135/9780857021007.n9
  4. Casson, M., 2006, Strategic alliances: A survey of issues from an entrepreneurial perspective
  5. Inkpen, A.C., 2002, Learning, knowledge management and strategic alliances: So many studies, so many unanswered questions
  6. Koza, M.P., 1998, Organization Science, 9, 225
  7. London, T., 2006, Strange bedfellows: Alliances between corporations and non-profits
  8. Ren, H., 2009, Journal of Management, 35, 805
  9. 10.4135/9780857021007.n10 · doi:10.4135/9780857021007.n10
  10. Rothaermel, F.T., 2009, Organization Science, 29, 47
  11. Thompson, J.D., 1967, Organizations in action

Metadata

Authors
Parmigiani, A., & Rivera-Santos, M.
Venue
Journal of Management
Published
2011-06-08
Volume
37
Issue
4
Pages
1108-1136
ISSN
  • 0149-2063 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-1211
OpenAlex
W2034509640
Cited by
448
References
102
FWCI
71.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clearing a Path Through the Forest: A Meta-Review of Interorganizational Relationships. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0149206311407507
The paper
Parmigiani, A., & Rivera-Santos, M. (2011). Clearing a Path Through the Forest: A Meta-Review of Interorganizational Relationships. Journal of Management. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311407507

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.