The DOI matches its Crossref record; 102 of the 102 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Clearing a Path Through the Forest: A Meta-Review of Interorganizational Relationships
Abstract
Interorganizational relationships (IORs) encompass a broad array of collaborative exchanges, including strategic alliances, joint ventures, buyer—supplier agreements, licensing, co-branding, franchising, cross-sector partnerships, networks, trade associations, and consortia. Scholarly work in this area typically focuses on particular forms, which has made it difficult to build a holistic understanding of why organizations engage in these relationships. This article summarizes the IOR literature by conducting a meta-review, a review of the reviews that have covered various IOR forms and theories. Through this approach, the authors highlight similarities and differences among forms and acknowledge perspectives grounded in organizational economics and organization theory. In line with March’s seminal framework, the authors identify two pure forms of IORs: co-exploration and co-exploitation. Explicating these pure forms enables the integration of different theories and the reconciliation of the empirical reality that IORs, like firms, combine exploration and exploitation. The authors conclude by suggesting directions for future work, highlighting areas rich in potential.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage
Barney, J. (1991) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639101700108 · Cited by 48,334
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2095101 · Cited by 38,435
Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage
Barney, J. B. (2004) · Advances in Strategic Management · doi:10.1016/s0742-3322(00)17018-4 · Cited by 38,152
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (2004) · Advances in Strategic Management · doi:10.1016/s0742-3322(00)17011-1 · Cited by 25,802
(2010) · Cited by 24,023
Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning
March, J. G. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.71 · Cited by 21,942
A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation
Nonaka, I. (1994) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.5.1.14 · Cited by 17,809 · cited 1×
“This will lead to joint decision making and rich, ongoing communication between partners but will involve a relatively small number of people to allow for the transfer and creation of new, tacit knowledge (Allen, 1979; Arrow, 1974; Nonaka, 1994).”
BackgroundToward a knowledge-based theory of the firm
Grant, R. M. (1996) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250171110 · Cited by 16,157
The Economic Institutions of Capitalism
Dugger, W. M. (1987) · Journal of Economic Issues · doi:10.1080/00213624.1987.11504638 · Cited by 14,786
External Control of Organizations: Resource Dependence Perspective
(2011) · Organizational Behavior 6 · doi:10.4324/9781315701967-54 · Cited by 14,181
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- Ahern, K.R., 2007, Journal of Applied Finance, 17, 5
- 10.1177/014920630002600302 · doi:10.1177/014920630002600302
- 10.4135/9780857021007.n9 · doi:10.4135/9780857021007.n9
- Casson, M., 2006, Strategic alliances: A survey of issues from an entrepreneurial perspective
- Inkpen, A.C., 2002, Learning, knowledge management and strategic alliances: So many studies, so many unanswered questions
- Koza, M.P., 1998, Organization Science, 9, 225
- London, T., 2006, Strange bedfellows: Alliances between corporations and non-profits
- Ren, H., 2009, Journal of Management, 35, 805
- 10.4135/9780857021007.n10 · doi:10.4135/9780857021007.n10
- Rothaermel, F.T., 2009, Organization Science, 29, 47
- Thompson, J.D., 1967, Organizations in action
Cited by
Castañer, X., & Oliveira, N. (2020) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206320901565 · Cited by 525
The mirroring hypothesis: theory, evidence, and exceptions
Colfer, L. J., & Baldwin, C. Y. (2016) · Industrial and Corporate Change · doi:10.1093/icc/dtw027 · Cited by 331
Lai, J. W. M., & Bower, M. (2020) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12412 · Cited by 92
Malik, A., Pereira, V., & Budhwar, P. (2021) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2020.100743 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Parmigiani, A., & Rivera-Santos, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Management
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2011-06-08
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1108-1136
- ISSN
- 0149-2063 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-1211
- OpenAlex
- W2034509640
- Cited by
- 448
- References
- 102
- FWCI
- 71.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clearing a Path Through the Forest: A Meta-Review of Interorganizational Relationships. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0149206311407507
- The paper
- Parmigiani, A., & Rivera-Santos, M. (2011). Clearing a Path Through the Forest: A Meta-Review of Interorganizational Relationships. Journal of Management. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311407507
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.