The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Multisite Pacing as a Supplemental Treatment of Congestive Heart Failure: Preliminary Results of the Medtronic Inc. InSync Study
Abstract
This report describes the initial results of the “InSync” study, a European and Canadian multicenter trial that examines the safety and efficacy of a multisite pacemaker (Medtronic InSync) and of left ventricular pacing leads (Medtronic 2187 and 2188) implanted via a cardiac vein as a supplemental treatment of refractory congestive heart failure. Over a 10‐month period, the system was implanted successfully in 68 of the 81 (84%) patients who had been enrolled in the study. The 68 patients were, on average, 66 ± 10 years old, had a mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) = 21 %± 9%, and 63% were in NYHA functional Class III and 37% were in Class IV. No system implant related complication occurred. During follow‐up, 7 of 10 patients who exited the study had died, 4 suddenly. There was a clinical benefit among surviving patients, which was corroborated by a significant improvement in NYHA functional class and in the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Quality of Life Questionnaire Score (MLS) and by a longer distance covered during a 6‐minute walk test. This clinical improvement was associated with a significant narrowing of the paced QRS complex during biventricular pacing, a significant decrease in the interventricular mechanical delay, and a trend towards an increase in the duration of ventricular filling. These encouraging preliminary results confirm the feasibility and reliability of this new multisite pacing system in the management of dilated cardiomyopathy and support the continuation of further evaluations of this complementary treatment of refractory congestive heart failure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cardiac Resynchronization in Chronic Heart Failure
Abraham, W. T., Fisher, W. G., Smith, A. L., Delurgio, D. B., Leon, A. R., Loh, E., Kocovic, D. Z., Packer, M., Clavell, A. L., Hayes, D. L., et al. (2002) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa013168 · Cited by 4,648
Evaluation of Coronary Venous Anatomy by Multislice Computed Tomography
Sun, J. P., Yang, X. S., Lam, Y. Y., Garcia, M. J., & Yu, C. M. (2012) · World Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery · doi:10.4236/wjcs.2012.24018 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- GRAS, D., MABO, P., TANG, T., LUTTIKUIS, O., CHATOOR, R., PEDERSEN, A., TSCHELIESSNIGG, H., DEHARO, J., PUGLISI, A., SILVESTRE, J., KIMBER, S., ROSS, H., RAVAZZI, A., PAUL, V., & SKEHAN, D.
- Venue
- Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-11
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2249-2255
- ISSN
- 0147-8389 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-8159
- OpenAlex
- W2144700130
- Cited by
- 398
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 27.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multisite Pacing as a Supplemental Treatment of Congestive Heart Failure: Preliminary Results of the Medtronic Inc. InSync Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1540-8159.1998.tb01162.x
- The paper
- GRAS, D., MABO, P., TANG, T., LUTTIKUIS, O., CHATOOR, R., PEDERSEN, A., TSCHELIESSNIGG, H., DEHARO, J., PUGLISI, A., SILVESTRE, J., KIMBER, S., ROSS, H., RAVAZZI, A., PAUL, V., & SKEHAN, D. (1998). Multisite Pacing as a Supplemental Treatment of Congestive Heart Failure: Preliminary Results of the Medtronic Inc. InSync Study. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.1998.tb01162.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.