Cited by 13Cardiac Arrhythmias and TreatmentsCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasAtrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes

Anatomic and electrophysiologic differences between chronic and paroxysmal atrial flutter: intracardiac echocardiographic analysis

OHKUBO, KIMIE, WATANABE, ICHIRO, OKUMURA, YASUO, ASHINO, SONOKO, KOFUNE, MASAYOSHI, KAWAUCHI, KAZUNORI, YAMADA, TAKESHI, KOFUNE, TATSUYA +7 more·2008·Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It remains unknown why atrial flutter (AFL) occurs as either a chronic or paroxysmal arrhythmia. PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to compare intracardiac echocardiographic (ICE) images of the crista terminalis (CT) and transverse conduction properties of the CT between chronic and paroxysmal forms of common AFL. METHODS: Chronic AFL (n = 7) was defined as non-self-terminating AFL lasting >1 month, and paroxysmal AFL (n = 8) was defined as an intermittent arrhythmia with symptomatic episodes of 24 hours maximum duration. ICE images of the right atrium were recorded with a 9 F 9-MHz intracardiac ultrasound catheter during pullback at 0.5-mm intervals from the superior vena cava to the inferior vena cava triggered by electrocardiogram and respiration. The two-dimensional image of the right atrium was reconstructed into a three-dimensional (3-D) image. RESULTS: Three-dimensional images from patients with chronic AFL showed the CT to be thick and continuous, and conduction across the CT was blocked at a pacing rate just above sinus rhythm in all seven patients. In contrast, 3D images from paroxysmal AFL showed the CT to be thin and discontinuous, and conduction across the CT during midseptal pacing was observed in five of the eight patients. CONCLUSION: The nature of AFL is determined, at least in part, by anatomic and electrophysiologic characteristics of the CT.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2008.01012.x

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
OHKUBO, K., WATANABE, I., OKUMURA, Y., ASHINO, S., KOFUNE, M., KAWAUCHI, K., YAMADA, T., KOFUNE, T., HASHIMOTO, K., SHINDO, A., SUGIMURA, H., NAKAI, T., KUNIMOTO, S., SAITO, S., & HIRAYAMA, A.
Affiliations
Nihon University (JP)
Corresponding author
WATANABE, ICHIRO
Venue
Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-03-27
Volume
31
Issue
4
Pages
432-437
ISSN
  • 0147-8389 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-8159
OpenAlex
W2055885887
Cited by
13
References
21
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Keywords
atrial flutter, paroxysmal atrial flutter, crista terminalis, conduction block, right atrium, intracardiac echocardiography, 3D reconstruction, interatrial septum, arrhythmia mechanisms
MeSH terms
Acute Disease, Adult, Aged, Atrial Flutter, Chronic Disease, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Ultrasonography, Interventional, Body Surface Potential Mapping, Echocardiography, Three-Dimensional

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review