Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 267

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Bundle Branch Reentrant Ventricular Tachycardia: Cumulative Experience in 48 Patients

BLANCK, ZALMEN, DHALA, ANWER, DESHPANDE, SANJAY, SRA, JASBIR, JAZAYERI, MOHAMMAD, AKHTAR, MASOOD·1993·Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology

Abstract

Sustained Bundle Branch Reentrant Tachycardia. introduction: The clinical, electrophysiologic features and follow‐up of 48 patients with inducible bundle branch reentrant (BBR) tachycardia are presented. Methods and Results: Forty‐eight patients were identified in whom a diagnosis of BBR tachycardia was made during electrophysiologic evaluation. The clinical presentation was syncope or sudden death in 38 patients, and sustained palpitations during wide QRS complex tachycardia in 5 patients. Electrophysiologic studies were performed in 5 additional patients for various other reasons. Structural heart disease was present in 45 patients. Idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy and coronary artery disease were the anatomical substrates in 19 (39%) and 24 (50%) patients, respectively, severe aortic regurgitation was present in 2 patients, and no organic heart disease was identified in 3. All 48 patients had evidence of His‐Purkinje system disease. BBR tachycardia with left and right bundle branch block morphologies was induced in 46 and 5 patients, respectively, and interfascicular BBR tachycardia was initiated in 2 patients. Ventricular tachycardia of a myocardial origin was induced in 11 patients. Management of BBR tachycardia included transcatheter bundle branch ablation in 28 patients, and antiarrhythmic drug therapy in 16 patients. Four patients were treated with implantablc defibrillators. After a mean follow‐up of 15.8 months in 42 patients, there were 13 deaths due to congestive heart failure, 4 sudden cardiac deaths, 3 nonsudden cardiac deaths, and 3 noncardiac related deaths. Conclusion: Sustained BBR, a form of monomorphic ventricular tachycardia, is a highly malignant arrhythmia usually seen in patients with structural heart disease. Three different types of BBR tachycardia are described. If distinguished from ventricular tachycardia of a myocardial origin, catheter ablation of the right bundle branch can be easily performed and effectively eliminates BBR. During follow‐up, congestive heart failure is the most common cause of death in this population.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1540-8167.1993.tb01228.x

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

See all 267

Metadata

Authors
BLANCK, Z., DHALA, A., DESHPANDE, S., SRA, J., JAZAYERI, M., & AKHTAR, M.
Venue
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1993-06
Volume
4
Issue
3
Pages
253-262
ISSN
  • 1045-3873 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-8167
OpenAlex
W1510552957
Cited by
267
References
8
FWCI
9.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bundle Branch Reentrant Ventricular Tachycardia: Cumulative Experience in 48 Patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1540-8167.1993.tb01228.x
The paper
BLANCK, Z., DHALA, A., DESHPANDE, S., SRA, J., JAZAYERI, M., & AKHTAR, M. (1993). Bundle Branch Reentrant Ventricular Tachycardia: Cumulative Experience in 48 Patients. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8167.1993.tb01228.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.