Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 611

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The M Cell: Its Contribution to the ECG and to Normal and Abnormal Electrical Function of the Heart

ANTZELEVITCH, CHARLES, SHIMIZU, WATARU, YAN, GAN‐XIN, SICOURI, SERGE, WEISSENBURGER, JACQUES, NESTERENKO, VLADISLAV V., BURASHNIKOV, ALEXANDER, DI DIEGO, JOSE, SAFFITZ, JEFEREY, THOMAS, GEORGE P.·1999·Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology

Abstract

Characteristics of the M Cell. The discovery and characterization of the M cell, a unique cell type residing in the deep layers of the ventricular myocardium, has opened a new door in our understanding of the electrophysiology and pharmacology of the heart in both health and disease. The hallmark of the M cell is the ability of its action potential to prolong much more than that of other ventricular myocardial cells in response to a slowing of rate and/or in response to agents that act to prolong action potential duration. Our goal in this review is to provide a comprehensive characterization of the M cell, its contribution to transmural heterogeneity, and its role in the normal electrical function of the heart, in the inscription of the ECG (particularly the T wave), and in the development of QT dispersion, T wave alternans, long QT intervals, and cardiac arrhythmias, such as torsades de pointes. Our secondary goal is to address the controversy that has arisen relative to the functional importance of the M cell in the normal heart. The controversy derives largely from the failure of some investigators to demonstrate transmural heterogeneity of repolarization in the dog in vivo under control conditions and after administration of quinidine. The inability to demonstrate transmural heterogeneity under these conditions may he due to the use of bipolar recording techniques that, in our experience, seriously underestimate transmural dispersion of repolarization (TDK). The use of sodium pentobarhital and α‐chloralose as anesthesia also is problematic, because these agents reduce or eliminate TDR by affecting a variety of ion channel currents. Finally, attempts to amplify transmural dispersion of repolarization with an agent such as quinidine must take into account that relatively high concentrations can result in effects opposite to those desired due to drug inhibition of multiple ion channels. These observations may explain the inability of earlier studies to detect the M cell.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1540-8167.1999.tb00287.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 611

Metadata

Authors
ANTZELEVITCH, C., SHIMIZU, W., YAN, G., SICOURI, S., WEISSENBURGER, J., NESTERENKO, V. V., BURASHNIKOV, A., DI DIEGO, J., SAFFITZ, J., & THOMAS, G. P.
Venue
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1999-08
Volume
10
Issue
8
Pages
1124-1152
ISSN
  • 1045-3873 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-8167
OpenAlex
W1944509346
Cited by
611
References
1
FWCI
20.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The M Cell: Its Contribution to the ECG and to Normal and Abnormal Electrical Function of the Heart. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1540-8167.1999.tb00287.x
The paper
ANTZELEVITCH, C., SHIMIZU, W., YAN, G., SICOURI, S., WEISSENBURGER, J., NESTERENKO, V. V., BURASHNIKOV, A., DI DIEGO, J., SAFFITZ, J., & THOMAS, G. P. (1999). The M Cell: Its Contribution to the ECG and to Normal and Abnormal Electrical Function of the Heart. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8167.1999.tb00287.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.