The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Thromboembolic Complications of Cardiac Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation: A Review of the Reported Incidence, Pathogenesis and Current Research Directions
Abstract
Thromboembolic Complications of Cardiac RF Catheter Ablation. Introduction: Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) has become established as an effective therapy for the treatment of many cardiac tachyarrhythmias. The principle limitation of conventional RFCA continues to be the risk of thromboembolism. This risk is of particular concern for the ongoing development of the catheter maze procedure for the treatment of atrial fibrillation, which currently involves the creation of extensive linear lesions in the left atrium. Methods and Results: A Medline search of the literature over the last ten years was performed. Focused review of the reported thromboembolic complications of RFCA indicates an overall incidence of 0.6%. However, the risk is increased when ablation is performed in the left heart (1.8% to 2%) and for ventricular tachycardia (2.8%). It is of concern that intravenous heparin and the use of temperature feedback to control radiofrequency current do not eliminate the risk of thromboembolic events. Conclusion: The thromboembolic complications of RFCA are not eliminated by the treatment of intravenous herapin and mode of temperature control during ablation. Potential approaches to further reduce the risk of thromboembolism include the adjunctive administration of specific inhibitors of platelet activation and aggregation, intraprocedural intracardiac echocardiography, irrigated radiofrequency ablation, and cryoablation catheter systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Jackman, W. M., Wang, X., Friday, K. J., Roman, C. A., Moulton, K. P., Beckman, K. J., McClelland, J. H., Twidale, N., Hazlitt, H. A., Prior, M. I., et al. (1991) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199106063242301 · Cited by 1,422
Cited by
EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias
Aliot, E. M., Stevenson, W. G., Almendral-Garrote, J. M., Bogun, F., Calkins, C. H., Delacretaz, E., Della Bella, P., Hindricks, G., Jaïs, P., Josephson, M. E., et al. (2009) · Heart Rhythm · doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2009.04.030 · Cited by 770
Yokoyama, K., Nakagawa, H., Shah, D. C., Lambert, H., Leo, G., Aeby, N., Ikeda, A., Pitha, J. V., Sharma, T., Lazzara, R., et al. (2008) · Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology · doi:10.1161/circep.108.803650 · Cited by 624
Lower Incidence of Thrombus Formation With Cryoenergy Versus Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation
Khairy, P., Chauvet, P., Lehmann, J., Lambert, J., Macle, L., Tanguay, J.-F., Sirois, M. G., Santoianni, D., & Dubuc, M. (2003) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000058706.82623.a1 · Cited by 507
Metadata
- Authors
- ZHOU, L., KEANE, D., REED, G., & RUSKIN, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1999-04
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 611-620
- ISSN
- 1045-3873 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-8167
- OpenAlex
- W1602368523
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Thromboembolic Complications of Cardiac Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation: A Review of the Reported Incidence, Pathogenesis and Current Research Directions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1540-8167.1999.tb00719.x
- The paper
- ZHOU, L., KEANE, D., REED, G., & RUSKIN, J. (1999). Thromboembolic Complications of Cardiac Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation: A Review of the Reported Incidence, Pathogenesis and Current Research Directions. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8167.1999.tb00719.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.