Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 453

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Long‐Term Safety and Efficacy of Circumferential Ablation with Pulmonary Vein Isolation

CHEEMA, AAMIR, DONG, JUN, DALAL, DARSHAN, VASAMREDDY, CHANDRASEKHAR R., MARINE, JOSEPH E., HENRIKSON, CHARLES A., SPRAGG, DAVID, CHENG, ALAN, NAZARIAN, SAMAN, SINHA, SUNIL, HALPERIN, HENRY, BERGER, RONALD, CALKINS, HUGH·2006·Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology

Abstract

Background: Each of the two main approaches to catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF, segmental and circumferential) is associated with moderate long‐term efficacy. Objective: To report the long‐term outcomes of a modified technique that combines circumferential ablation with pulmonary vein (PV) isolation, determined by a circular mapping catheter and to determine the relationship between complete PV isolation and long‐term efficacy. Methods: The patient population was composed of 64 consecutive patients (47 men [73%]; age 59 ± 11 years) with AF who underwent catheter ablation. AF was paroxysmal in 29 (45%) and nonparoxysmal in 35 (55%). Each patient was followed for a minimum of 12 months. Results: After a mean follow‐up of 13 ± 1 months, the long‐term single‐procedure success rate was 45% (n = 29) with an additional 4% (n = 3) of patients demonstrating improvement. With repeat procedures in 19 patients, the overall long‐term success rate was 62% (n = 40) with 9% (n = 6) demonstrating improvement. All the patients who underwent repeat ablations had recovered PV conduction. Incomplete PV isolation was the only independent predictor of failure. A major complication occurred in four (6%) patients, including three patients with vascular complications and one with cardiac tamponade. Conclusion: Our results suggest that the long‐term single‐procedure efficacy of circumferential ablation with PV isolation in a cohort of patients with predominantly nonparoxysmal AF approaches 50%. Repeat procedures involving re‐isolation of the PVs result in a significant improvement in outcomes. Complete electrical isolation of the PVs has a significant impact on the long‐term efficacy of the procedure.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2006.00569.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 453

Metadata

Authors
CHEEMA, A., DONG, J., DALAL, D., VASAMREDDY, C. R., MARINE, J. E., HENRIKSON, C. A., SPRAGG, D., CHENG, A., NAZARIAN, S., SINHA, S., HALPERIN, H., BERGER, R., & CALKINS, H.
Venue
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-07-26
Volume
17
Issue
10
Pages
1080-1085
ISSN
  • 1045-3873 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-8167
OpenAlex
W2046003585
Cited by
453
References
0
FWCI
51.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Long‐Term Safety and Efficacy of Circumferential Ablation with Pulmonary Vein Isolation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1540-8167.2006.00569.x
The paper
CHEEMA, A., DONG, J., DALAL, D., VASAMREDDY, C. R., MARINE, J. E., HENRIKSON, C. A., SPRAGG, D., CHENG, A., NAZARIAN, S., SINHA, S., HALPERIN, H., BERGER, R., & CALKINS, H. (2006). Long‐Term Safety and Efficacy of Circumferential Ablation with Pulmonary Vein Isolation. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8167.2006.00569.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.