The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Long‐Term Safety and Efficacy of Circumferential Ablation with Pulmonary Vein Isolation
Abstract
Background: Each of the two main approaches to catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF, segmental and circumferential) is associated with moderate long‐term efficacy. Objective: To report the long‐term outcomes of a modified technique that combines circumferential ablation with pulmonary vein (PV) isolation, determined by a circular mapping catheter and to determine the relationship between complete PV isolation and long‐term efficacy. Methods: The patient population was composed of 64 consecutive patients (47 men [73%]; age 59 ± 11 years) with AF who underwent catheter ablation. AF was paroxysmal in 29 (45%) and nonparoxysmal in 35 (55%). Each patient was followed for a minimum of 12 months. Results: After a mean follow‐up of 13 ± 1 months, the long‐term single‐procedure success rate was 45% (n = 29) with an additional 4% (n = 3) of patients demonstrating improvement. With repeat procedures in 19 patients, the overall long‐term success rate was 62% (n = 40) with 9% (n = 6) demonstrating improvement. All the patients who underwent repeat ablations had recovered PV conduction. Incomplete PV isolation was the only independent predictor of failure. A major complication occurred in four (6%) patients, including three patients with vascular complications and one with cardiac tamponade. Conclusion: Our results suggest that the long‐term single‐procedure efficacy of circumferential ablation with PV isolation in a cohort of patients with predominantly nonparoxysmal AF approaches 50%. Repeat procedures involving re‐isolation of the PVs result in a significant improvement in outcomes. Complete electrical isolation of the PVs has a significant impact on the long‐term efficacy of the procedure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Oken, E., & Gillman, M. W. (2003) · Obesity Research · doi:10.1038/oby.2003.69 · Cited by 912
Is Sleep Duration Associated With Childhood Obesity? A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis
Chen, X., Beydoun, M. A., & Wang, Y. (2008) · Obesity · doi:10.1038/oby.2007.63 · Cited by 796
Wolin, K. Y., Carson, K., & Colditz, G. A. (2010) · The Oncologist · doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2009-0285 · Cited by 778
Primary Care Physicians’ Attitudes about Obesity and Its Treatment
Foster, G. D., Wadden, T. A., Makris, A. P., Davidson, D., Sanderson, R. S., Allison, D. B., & Kessler, A. (2003) · Obesity Research · doi:10.1038/oby.2003.161 · Cited by 744
Changes in Perceived Weight Discrimination Among Americans, 1995–1996 Through 2004–2006
Andreyeva, T., Puhl, R. M., & Brownell, K. D. (2008) · Obesity · doi:10.1038/oby.2008.35 · Cited by 684
Metadata
- Authors
- CHEEMA, A., DONG, J., DALAL, D., VASAMREDDY, C. R., MARINE, J. E., HENRIKSON, C. A., SPRAGG, D., CHENG, A., NAZARIAN, S., SINHA, S., HALPERIN, H., BERGER, R., & CALKINS, H.
- Venue
- Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-07-26
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1080-1085
- ISSN
- 1045-3873 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-8167
- OpenAlex
- W2046003585
- Cited by
- 453
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 51.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Long‐Term Safety and Efficacy of Circumferential Ablation with Pulmonary Vein Isolation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1540-8167.2006.00569.x
- The paper
- CHEEMA, A., DONG, J., DALAL, D., VASAMREDDY, C. R., MARINE, J. E., HENRIKSON, C. A., SPRAGG, D., CHENG, A., NAZARIAN, S., SINHA, S., HALPERIN, H., BERGER, R., & CALKINS, H. (2006). Long‐Term Safety and Efficacy of Circumferential Ablation with Pulmonary Vein Isolation. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8167.2006.00569.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.