Cited by 583Food composition and propertiesPolysaccharides Composition and ApplicationsProteins in Food Systems

Rice Starch Diversity: Effects on Structural, Morphological, Thermal, and Physicochemical Properties—A Review

Wani, Ali Abas, Singh, Preeti, Shah, Manzoor Ahmad, Schweiggert‐Weisz, Ute, Gul, Khalid, Wani, Idrees Ahmed·2012·Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety

Abstract

Rice starch is one of the major cereal starches with novel functional properties. Significant progress has been made in recent years on the characterization of rice starches separated from different rice cultivars. Studies have revealed that the molecular structure and functional properties are affected by rice germplasm, isolation procedure, climate, agronomic conditions, and grain development. Morphological studies (microscopy and particle size analysis) have reflected significant differences among rice starch granule shapes (polyhedral, irregular) and in granule size (2 to 7 μm). Nonwaxy and long‐grain rice starches show greater variation in granular size than the waxy starches. Rice starch granules are smaller than other cereal starches with amylose contents varying from virtually amylose‐free in waxy to about 35% in nonwaxy and long‐grain rice starches. Amylose content appears to be the major factor controlling almost all physicochemical properties of rice starch due to its influence on pasting, gelatinization, retrogradation, syneresis, and other functional properties. Waxy rice starches have high swelling and solubility parameters, and larger relative crystallinity values than nonwaxy and long‐grain starches. However, nonwaxy rice starches have a higher gelatinization temperature than the waxy and long‐grain starches. The bland taste, nonallergenicity, and smooth, creamy, and spreadable characteristics of rice starch make it unique and valuable in food and pharmaceutic…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1541-4337.2012.00193.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wani, A. A., Singh, P., Shah, M. A., Schweiggert‐Weisz, U., Gul, K., & Wani, I. A.
Affiliations
Fraunhofer Institute for Process Engineering and Packaging (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Wani, Ali Abas
  • Singh, Preeti
  • Shah, Manzoor Ahmad
  • Schweiggert‐Weisz, Ute
  • Gul, Khalid
  • Wani, Idrees Ahmed
Venue
Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-08-24
Volume
11
Issue
5
Pages
417-436
ISSN
1541-4337 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1988349168
Cited by
583
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 69 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety (publishedVersion)
  • Fraunhofer-Publica (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Polysaccharides Composition and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Proteins in Food Systems
Keywords
rice starch, starch granule morphology, amylose content, waxy rice starch, starch functional properties, gelatinization, pasting properties, starch crystallinity, starch retrogradation, starch granule size, rice varieties

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review