Cited by 24Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlCardiac pacing and defibrillation studies

Beat‐to‐Beat QT Interval Variability Is Primarily Affected by the Autonomic Nervous System

Open access
Mine, Takanao, Shimizu, Hiroki, Hiromoto, Kenji, Furukawa, Yoshio, Kanemori, Tetsuzou, Nakamura, Hiroaki, Masuyama, Tohru, Ohyanagi, Mitsumasa·2008·Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology

Abstract

Background: Beat‐to‐beat QT interval variability is associated with life‐threatening arrhythmias and sudden death, however, its precious mechanism and the autonomic modulation on it remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of drugs that modulate the autonomic nervous system on beat‐to‐beat QT interval. Method: RR and QT intervals were determined for 512 consecutive beats during fixed atrial pacing with and without propranolol and automatic blockade (propranolol plus atropine) in 11 patients without structural heart disease. Studied parameters included: RR, QTpeak (QRS onset to the peak of T wave), QTend (QRS onset to the end of T wave) interval, standard deviation (SD) of the RR, QTpeak, and QTend (RR‐SD, QTpeak‐SD, and QTend‐SD), coefficients of variation (RR‐ CV, QTpeak‐CV, and QTend‐CV) from time domain analysis, total power (TP; RR‐TP, QTpeak‐TP, and QTend‐TP), and power spectral density of the low‐frequency band (LF; RR‐LF, QTpeak‐LF, and QTend‐LF) and the high‐frequency band (HF; RR‐HF, QTpeak‐HF and QTend‐HF). Results: Administration of propranolol and infusion of atropine resulted in the reduction of SD, CV, TP, and HF of the QTend interval when compared to controlled atrial pacing (3.7 ± 0.6 and 3.5 ± 0.5 vs 4.8 ± 1.4 ms, 0.9 ± 0.1 and 0.9 ± 0.1 vs 1.2 ± 0.3%, 7.0 ± 2.2 and 7.0 ± 2.2 vs 13.4 ± 8.1 ms 2, 4.2 ± 1.4 and 4.2 ± 1.2 vs 8.4 ± 4.9 ms 2, respectively). Administration of propranolol and atropine did not affect RR interval or QTpeak interval indices during controlled atrial pacing. Conclusions: Beat‐to‐beat QT interval variability is affected by drugs that modulate the autonomic nervous system.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1542-474x.2008.00225.x

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Beat-to-beat QT interval variability is affected by drugs that modulate the autonomic nervous system.

    “Mine and coworkers 39 demonstrated that beat-to-beat QT interval variability is affected by drugs that modulate the autonomic nervous system.”

    From The Year of 2008 in Electrocardiology (2010) · cites this paper as [39]

  • The parasympathetic system may act preferentially on the QT interval itself while the sympathetic system appears to affect QT interval variability.

    “These finding indicated that the parasympathetic system may act preferentially on the QT interval itself while the sympathetic system appears to affect QT interval variability.”

    From The Year of 2008 in Electrocardiology (2010) · cites this paper as [39]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [19]19. Mesquita ET, Deus FC, Guedes CR, et al Effects of propranolol on the QT dispersion in congestive heart failure. Arq Bras Cardiol 1999;73:291–298. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Articles from Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology : The Official Journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc are provided here courtesy of International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc. and Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mine, T., Shimizu, H., Hiromoto, K., Furukawa, Y., Kanemori, T., Nakamura, H., Masuyama, T., & Ohyanagi, M.
Affiliations
  • Hyogo Medical University (JP)
  • Takarazuka City Hospital (JP)
  • Osaka Prefectural Medical Center (JP)
Venue
Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-07
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
228-233
ISSN
  • 1082-720X (ISSN-L)
  • 1542-474X
OpenAlex
W2010716250
Cited by
24
References
20
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Keywords
autonomic nervous system, propranolol, atropine, heart rate variability, atrial pacing, autonomic regulation, sudden cardiac death risk
MeSH terms
Aged, Anti-Arrhythmia Agents, Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Flutter, Atropine, Autonomic Nervous System, Electrocardiography, Female, Humans, Long QT Syndrome, Male, Middle Aged, Propranolol, Sensitivity and Specificity, Severity of Illness Index, Sick Sinus Syndrome, Tachycardia, Supraventricular, Reproducibility of Results, Cohort Studies, Survival Rate, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review