The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How Important is Selection? Experimental VS. Non-Experimental Measures of the Income Gains from Migration
Abstract
How much do migrants stand to gain in income from moving across borders? Answering this question is complicated by non-random selection of migrants from the general population, which makes it hard to obtain an appropriate comparison group of non-migrants. New Zealand allows a quota of Tongans to immigrate each year with a random ballot used to choose among the excess number of applicants. A unique survey conducted by the authors allows experimental estimates of the income gains from migration to be obtained by comparing the incomes of migrants to those who applied to migrate, but whose names were not drawn in the ballot, after allowing for the effect of non-compliance among some of those whose names were drawn. We also conducted a survey of individuals who did not apply for the ballot. Comparing this non-applicant group to the migrants enables assessment of the degree to which non-experimental methods can provide an unbiased estimate of the income gains from migration. We find evidence of migrants being positively selected in terms of both observed and unobserved skills. As a result, non-experimental methods other than instrumental variables are found to overstate the gains from migration by 20–82%, with difference-in-differences and bias-adjusted matching estimators performing best among the alternatives to instrumental variables.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects
ROSENBAUM, P. R., & RUBIN, D. B. (1983) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/70.1.41 · Cited by 31,241
Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: Evidence from evaluating a job training programme
Heckman, J. J., Ichimura, H., & Todd, P. E. (1997) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.2307/2971733 · Cited by 5,486
The analysis of household surveys: A microeconometric approach to development policy
Deaton, A. (1997) · doi:10.1596/0-8018-5254-4 · Cited by 4,877
Propensity Score-Matching Methods for Nonexperimental Causal Studies
Dehejia, R. H., & Wahba, S. (2002) · Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/003465302317331982 · Cited by 4,846
Identification of Causal Effects Using Instrumental Variables
Angrist, J. D., Imbens, G. W., & Rubin, D. B. (1996) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1996.10476902 · Cited by 4,230
Matching As An Econometric Evaluation Estimator
Heckman, J. J., Ichimura, H., & Todd, P. (1998) · Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.1111/1467-937x.00044 · Cited by 3,807
Does matching overcome lalonde’s critique of nonexperimental estimators?
A. Smith, J., & E. Todd, P. (2005) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2004.04.011 · Cited by 3,176
Nonparametric Estimation of Average Treatment Effects Under Exogeneity: A Review
Imbens, G. W. (2004) · Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/003465304323023651 · Cited by 2,994
Large sample properties of matching estimators for average treatment effects
Abadie, A., & Imbens, G. W. (2006) · Econometrica · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0262.2006.00655.x · Cited by 2,908
Estimation of Average Treatment Effects Based on Propensity Scores
Becker, S. O., & Ichino, A. (2002) · The Stata Journal: Promoting communications on statistics and Stata · doi:10.1177/1536867x0200200403 · Cited by 2,754
Cited by
Heat stress increases long-term human migration in rural Pakistan
Mueller, V., Gray, C., & Kosec, K. (2014) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate2103 · Cited by 479
Do Poverty Traps Exist? Assessing the Evidence
Kraay, A., & McKenzie, D. (2014) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.28.3.127 · Cited by 355
Self-citationBrain drain or brain gain? Effects of high-skilled international emigration on origin countries
Batista, C., Han, D., Haushofer, J., Khanna, G., McKenzie, D., Mobarak, A. M., Theoharides, C., & Yang, D. (2025) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adr8861 · Cited by 50
Self-citationAntón, J. I., & Muñoz de Bustillo, R. (2016) · Investigación Económica · doi:10.1016/j.inveco.2015.08.005 · Cited by 23
Harding, D., Sanbonmatsu, L., Duncan, G., Gennetian, L., Katz, L., Kessler, R., Kling, J., Sciandra, M., & Ludwig, J. (2021) · doi:10.3386/w28454 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- McKenzie, D., Stillman, S., & Gibson, J.
- Venue
- Journal of the European Economic Association
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010-06
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 913-945
- ISSN
- 1542-4766 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3125262165
- Cited by
- 409
- References
- 30
- FWCI
- 70.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How Important is Selection? Experimental VS. Non-Experimental Measures of the Income Gains from Migration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1542-4774.2010.tb00544.x
- The paper
- McKenzie, D., Stillman, S., & Gibson, J. (2010). How Important is Selection? Experimental VS. Non-Experimental Measures of the Income Gains from Migration. Journal of the European Economic Association. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1542-4774.2010.tb00544.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
