Cited by 190Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyFamily Caregiving in Mental IllnessCounseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics

Family Connections: A Program for Relatives of Persons With Borderline Personality Disorder

Open access

Abstract

This study assessed changes in family members who participated in Family Connections, a 12‐week manualized education program for relatives of persons with borderline personality disorder (BPD). Family Connections, led by trained family members, is based on the strategies of standard Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) and DBT for families. The program provides (a) current information and research on BPD, (b) coping skills, (c) family skills, and (d) opportunities to build a support network for family members. Forty‐four participants representing 34 families completed the pre‐, post‐, and 6‐month postbaseline self‐report questionnaires. Analyses employing hierarchical linear modeling strategies showed significant reductions in grief and burden, and a significant increase in mastery from pre‐ to post‐group assessment. Changes were maintained at 6 months post baseline.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1545-5300.2005.00055.x

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Family members of people with mental disorder have risk of depression, emotional burden, grief, and isolation.

    “Los familiares de personas con un trastorno mental tienen riesgo de padecer depresión, sobrecarga emocional, duelo y aislamiento (Greenberg, Seltzer, y Greenley, 1993;Hoffman et al., 2005).”

    From Efectividad y aceptabilidad del entrenamiento en habilidades de la terapia dialéctica comportamental para familiares de personas con trastorno de personalidad límite (2019) · cites this paper as Hoffman et al., 2005

    The Introduction reports burden, depression, loss, and grief among relatives of people with borderline personality disorder (BPD). The Discussion also says these family members frequently report feeling isolated. The cited paper supports the listed experiences for relatives of people with BPD, but the claim extends them to relatives of people with mental disorders generally. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Family members of people with BPD have more risk of suffering from psychological problems.

    “Despite family members of people with BPD having more risk of suffering from psychological problems, there are no empirically-validated interventions for this population.”

    From Efectividad y aceptabilidad del entrenamiento en habilidades de la terapia dialéctica comportamental para familiares de personas con trastorno de personalidad límite (2019) · cites this paper as Hoffman et al., 2005

    The Introduction says family members of people with BPD often experience depression, grief, burden, and other distress. It does not establish that they have a higher risk of psychological problems than a comparison group. The Introduction also says that no standardized programs to alleviate the impact on relatives had been evaluated. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Pilot studies evaluating FC indicate improvements in grief, emotional burden, psychological well-being, and self-efficacy of family members after receiving the program.

    “Los estudios piloto que han evaluado el programa FC® indican mejorías en el duelo (i.e., las experiencias cognitivas, emocionales y psicológicas como tristeza, dolor y pérdida asociadas a tener un familiar con trastorno mental; Hoffman, 2005, p. 220), la sobrecarga emocional, el bienestar psicológico y la autoeficacia de los familiares tras recibir el programa (Hoffman et al., 2005;Hoffman et al.,”
  • El resultado de un tamaño del efecto grande en agotamiento emocional es alentador, va en la línea de previas investigaciones que evaluaron el programa FC y sugiere que incluir componentes específicos para las relaciones familiares podría disminuir la sobrecarga emocional del cuidador.

    “Este resultado es alentador, ya que va en la línea de previas investigaciones que evaluaron el programa FC (Flynn et al., 2017;Hoffman et al., 2005;Hoffman, et al., 2007;Rajalin et al., 2009) y sugiere que incluir componentes específicos para las relaciones familiares podría disminuir la sobrecarga emocional del cuidador.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 12 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Family Perspectives on Borderline Personality Disorder. (2002). From Research to Community. Breakout Proceedings Conference of the National Education Alliance for Borderline Per- sonality Disorder and Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY.
  2. Family Perspectives on Borderline Personality Disorder. (2003). BPD and Co-occurring Dis- orders. Conference of the National Education Alliance for Borderline Personality Disorder and Weill Medical College of Cornell University, White Plains, NY.
  3. Harman, M.J., & Walso, M. (2001). Family treatment of borderline personality disorder through relationship enhancement therapy. In M.M. MacFarlane (Ed.), Family therapy and mental health: Innovations in theory and practice (pp. 215-235). New York: Haworth Clinical Practice Press.
  4. Hoffman, P.D., & Fruzzetti, A.E. (2005). Psychoeducation. In J.M. Oldham, A. Skodol, & D. Bender (Eds.), Textbook of personality disorders (pp. 375-385). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing.
  5. Hoffman, P.D., & Hooley, J.M. (1998). Expressed emotion and treatment of borderline per- sonality disorder. In Session: Psychotherapy in Practice, 4(3), 39-54.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hoffman, P. D., Fruzzetti, A. E., Buteau, E., Neiditch, E. R., Penney, D., Bruce, M. L., Hellman, F., & Struening, E.
Affiliations
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • University of Nevada, Reno (US)
  • Tufts University (US)
  • Cornell University (US)
  • New York State Psychiatric Institute (US)
Venue
Family Process
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-05-10
Volume
44
Issue
2
Pages
217-225
ISSN
  • 0014-7370 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-5300
OpenAlex
W2167190782
Cited by
190
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
6.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Family Process (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (7k08mh001602-06)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K08 MH001602-05)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
Keywords
borderline personality disorder, relatives of patients, family education programs, family ties, dialectical behavior therapy, coping strategies, family skills, grief, caregiver burden, mastery, family support networks, manualized intervention
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Borderline Personality Disorder, Family, Family Therapy, Female, Health Education, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, United States, Program Evaluation, Program Development, Cost of Illness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review