The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nurse Staffing Levels and Adverse Events Following Surgery in U.S. Hospitals
Abstract
Purpose: To examine the relationship between nurse staffing and selected adverse events hypothesized to be sensitive to nursing care, while controlling for related hospital characteristics. Efforts in the United States to reduce hospital costs, resulting in strategies to use fewer nurses, have stimulated extensive debate but little evaluation. Design: Survey using data from a 20% stratified probability sample to approximate U.S. community hospitals. The sample included 589 acute‐care hospitals in 10 states. Methods: Discharge data from 1993 for patients aged 18 years and over were used to create hospital‐level adverse event indicators. These hospital‐level data were matched to American Hospital Association data on community hospital characteristics, including nurse staffing, to examine the relationship between nurse staffing and adverse events. Results: A large and significant inverse relationship was found between full‐time‐equivalent RNs per adjusted inpatient day (RNAPD) and urinary tract infections after major surgery (p<.0001) as well as pneumonia after major surgery (p<.001). A significant but less robust inverse relationship was found between RNAPD and thrombosis after major surgery (p<.01), as well as pulmonary compromise after major surgery (p<.05). Conclusions: Inverse relationships between nurse staffing and these adverse events provide information for managers to use when redesigning and restructuring the clinical workforce employed in providing inpatient care.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hospital Characteristics and Mortality Rates
Hartz, A. J., Krakauer, H., Kuhn, E. M., Young, M., Jacobsen, S. J., Gay, G., Muenz, L., Katzoff, M., Bailey, R. C., & Rimm, A. A. (1989) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198912213212506 · Cited by 513
Cited by
Nurses’ Reports On Hospital Care In Five Countries
Aiken, L. H., Clarke, S. P., Sloane, D. M., Sochalski, J. A., Busse, R., Clarke, H., Giovannetti, P., Hunt, J., Rafferty, A. M., & Shamian, J. (2001) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.20.3.43 · Cited by 1,623
Nurse Staffing and Inpatient Hospital Mortality
Needleman, J., Buerhaus, P., Pankratz, V. S., Leibson, C. L., Stevens, S. R., & Harris, M. (2011) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsa1001025 · Cited by 942
Nurse staffing, burnout, and health care-associated infection.
Cimiotti, J. P., Aiken, L. H., Sloane, D. M., & Wu, E. S. (2012) · American Journal of Infection Control · doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2012.02.029 · Cited by 763
Spence Laschinger, H. K., & Leiter, M. P. (2006) · JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration · doi:10.1097/00005110-200605000-00019 · Cited by 723
Nurse Moral Distress and Ethical Work Environment
Corley, M. C., Minick, P., Elswick, R. K., & Jacobs, M. (2005) · Nursing Ethics · doi:10.1191/0969733005ne809oa · Cited by 593
Metadata
- Authors
- Kovner, C., & Gergen, P. J.
- Venue
- Image: the Journal of Nursing Scholarship
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-12
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 315-321
- ISSN
- 0363-2792 (ISSN-L)
- 0743-5150
- OpenAlex
- W2088393330
- Cited by
- 400
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 89.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nurse Staffing Levels and Adverse Events Following Surgery in U.S. Hospitals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1547-5069.1998.tb01326.x
- The paper
- Kovner, C., & Gergen, P. J. (1998). Nurse Staffing Levels and Adverse Events Following Surgery in U.S. Hospitals. Image: the Journal of Nursing Scholarship. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.1998.tb01326.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.